Reduction of court fee in 2019: do we have to rejoice?
Electronic Trust Services: What Is Changed? (Part II)
Electronic Trust Services: What Is Changed? (Part I)
To adjust financial result or to apply TP – that is the question
Transfer pricing in figures
To resolve doubts
Exit Capital Tax 2019 — leave them, kids, alone
Leave us alone. How the Exit Capital Tax will change business behavior
Corporate Profit Tax: an obstacle to GDP growth
To lose on someone else’s mistakes
Payment under a preliminary agreement: prepayment only or not?
They looked as if they had complete confidence in their conclusions but then just changed their minds:
the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine insists that there is no need to make quarterly 30 % adjustments in transactions with companies registered in «low tax» jurisdictions and companies with legal forms included into the special list adopted by CMU
New obstacles for taxpayers. Reimbursement of legal aid expenses
Presidential Administration answered whether ATO was completed
Payment of dividends in cash is a controlled transaction? Are you kidding?
Electronic administration system – VAT on manual control?
Corporate Risks under the Law on Companies
The Great Chamber of the Supreme Court will consider the issue (in case on “old” VAT reimbursement) – whether
(1) the demand on recovery of funds from the State Budget is deemed as appropriate effective defense of violated rights of taxpayers, or
(2) the Court considers solely application on motivation of state authorities to do what they should have done
And how one can recover “old” VAT budget reimbursement which was to be recovered according to the Temporary register
New Law on Companies
The Supreme Court – our expectations are not justified. Analysis of the Supreme Court’s practice on the form of offence guilt, prescribed by Art. 485 of the Customs Code of Ukraine
Is ATO over?
Or “I’ve brought you a package… But I will not give it to you”
The art of proper handling with digital evidences