Criminal method of tax administration
The article describes the problem of prosecuting the chairman and/or members of the tax commission for an illegal decision to assign the risky status or block tax invoices, analyzes the legislation and relevant court practice, provides recommendations on how to “lift the veil” of the collegiality of the decision behind which the chairman and/or members of the tax commission are hiding from responsibility.
The full version of the article is available in Ukrainian by the link.
Kind regards,
SIMILAR POSTS
The District Administrative Court of Kyiv has been liquidated: the worst expectations are becoming reality 
1800
Templates of notification of a crime based on Article 366 “Official forgery” / Article 367 “Official negligence” of the Criminal Code of Ukraine
703
The District Administrative Court of Kyiv will be liquidated. What does this mean for the parties whose cases are under consideration in the court?
1910
The status of “risky”: To appeal or not to appeal?
10216
SUPREME COURT: DEMAND ON RECOGNITION OF INCOME FROM LONG-TERM DEBT DISCOUNTING IS ILLEGAL
5739
The magic of numbers, or
Limitation periods in tax disputes: 1095 vs. 30
9433
Attention! Changes related to terms for challenging tax accruals to the court after administrative appeal stage. And other terms in other cases
1368
Considered as “risky”? Any chances to protect the company?
8440
Tax dispute: what else to be guided by besides the Tax Code?
2905
Leave a comment