The status of “risky”: To appeal or not to appeal?
The Supreme Court of Ukraine in the Resolution as of August 5, 2022, once again indicated that assigning taxpayer to the list of taxpayers who meet the risk criteria does not violate the rights and interests of such a taxpayer.
The main thing in this case is that the Supreme Court has been governed by the Procedure No. 117, which has already expired. And the new Procedure for suspension of the registration of a tax invoice/calculation of adjustment No. 1165 provides for the right of the taxpayer to appeal such assigning to the list of risky taxpayers.
This is extremely logical, because the primary source of the problem for the taxpayer is his classification as “risky”, and the blocking of tax invoices and the subsequent refusal to register are consequences of such assignment of the taxpayer to the list of risky.
It should be noted that the Supreme Court has already established a permanent position that such assigning to the list of risky, made on the basis of Procedure No. 1165, unlike the one made on the basis of Procedure No. 117, is a subject to appeal.
The full version of the article is available in Ukrainian by the link.
Kind regards,
SIMILAR POSTS
Alexander Minin and Ivan Shynkarenko spoke at the АНК Ukraine webinar “Navigating Ukraine’s Tax and Customs Systems”
51
Is the status of a tax agent absolute?
(An analysis of inconsistent case law in disputes between pawnshops and tax authorities)
223
Fault and illegality in tax violations: Controversial approaches in the practice of unscheduled tax audits
379
How are discrepancies in the texts of different language versions addressed when applying double tax treaties?
358
Filing a claim via the Electronic Cabinet: Can attorneys confirm their authority in electronic form and reliably obtain a ruling on the opening of administrative proceedings?
1538
“Where to find the true law” update: Repealed provision finally removed from the consolidated Tax Code on the Parliament’s website
414
Procedural pressure
234
Accounting and/or tax compliance outsourcing: Does it exempt the taxpayer from responsibility for possible errors?
510
Documents during tax audits vs. evidence in tax disputes
682
Alexander Minin and Yuliia Kryvomaz spoke at the XIV Tax Forum of the Ukrainian Bar Association
515
Additional capital in Ukrainian TOVs (LLCs): Is it now easier or harder for tax purposes?
1785
Triple reduction in tax assessments and a cancelled tax notice – a big win for our agribusiness client
445
Leave a comment







