+ Word must be in search result. - Words must not be in search result. * Word start/end on characters before/after symbol. ""Words in quotes will be searched as phrase.

 

“Massive” requests regarding application of the 30% adjustment on corporate income tax. What is wrong and what to do?

authors: Alexander Minin, Ivan Shynkarenko

03 August, 2023 Exclusive

The rule on 30% adjustment to the amount of the value of goods (works, services) purchased from non-residents from the lists of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine has been provided for in paragraph 140.5.4 of the Tax Code of Ukraine since 2015.

Law 466-IX, which entered into force on May 23, 2020, added to the Tax Code of Ukraine the provision 140.5.5-1 that extended 30% adjustment of the financial result to transactions for the sale of goods (works, services).

In essence, such provisions extend the requirement to justify the compliance with the "arm's length" principle to transactions with non-residents from the lists of the Cabinet of Ministers, both with related and unrelated parties.

At the same time, provisions regarding 30% adjustment and the practice of their application do not correspond to the primary purpose of their introduction as they put hardly justifiable burden on a significant number of taxpayers, as well as the burden on tax authorities in terms of tax administration.

In addition, these provisions do not correspond to the general principles of taxation, in particular the principles of economic efficiency and neutrality.

The best solution is to abolish these provisions or at least significantly transform them.

The full version of the article is available in Ukrainian by the link.

 

Full text is open only for the subscribers.

Views 2207

SIMILAR POSTS

Better late than never: Legislators have finally decided to improve the rules on liability for correction of TP Reporting 12 March, 2025    1108

The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine has updated the list of low-tax jurisdictions 20 January, 2025    1560

The Multilateral Competent Authority Agreement on the Exchange of Country-by-Country Reports has entered into force for Ukraine: Implications for participants of MNE groups in Ukraine 07 November, 2024    776

Changes in the characteristics of non-resident counterparties for recognising transactions as controlled or making a 30% adjustment for corporate profit tax purposes 02 August, 2024    1835

Ukrainian Court Denies Characterization As Stewardship Expenses 10 July, 2024    877

Comparables Selection Was Correct After All, Ukrainian Court Says 11 April, 2024    434

The case Olympex Coupe International v. State Tax Service: the Supreme Court of Ukraine has finally decided to disallow the tax office’s “creative” application of the transactional net margin method 01 March, 2024    1355

Important transfer pricing court practice: the cassation appeal of the tax office has been (partially) satisfied again by the Supreme Court – why is the case important and what significant nuances have not been taken into account? 13 November, 2023    1761

Comparables Analysis Insufficient; Ukrainian Court Remands Case 18 September, 2023    1122

Ukraine: The War is not an excuse to ignore Transfer Pricing Compliance 06 February, 2023    1023

Finally! Ukraine has joined Multilateral Competent Authority Agreement on the Exchange of Country-by-Country Reports 09 November, 2022    1798

New decision of the Supreme Court of Ukraine regarding TP rules: new approaches to the application of the CUP method, but, unfortunately, questions still remain 05 October, 2022    2201

Comment