“Massive” requests regarding application of the 30% adjustment on corporate income tax. What is wrong and what to do?
The rule on 30% adjustment to the amount of the value of goods (works, services) purchased from non-residents from the lists of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine has been provided for in paragraph 140.5.4 of the Tax Code of Ukraine since 2015.
Law 466-IX, which entered into force on May 23, 2020, added to the Tax Code of Ukraine the provision 140.5.5-1 that extended 30% adjustment of the financial result to transactions for the sale of goods (works, services).
In essence, such provisions extend the requirement to justify the compliance with the "arm's length" principle to transactions with non-residents from the lists of the Cabinet of Ministers, both with related and unrelated parties.
At the same time, provisions regarding 30% adjustment and the practice of their application do not correspond to the primary purpose of their introduction as they put hardly justifiable burden on a significant number of taxpayers, as well as the burden on tax authorities in terms of tax administration.
In addition, these provisions do not correspond to the general principles of taxation, in particular the principles of economic efficiency and neutrality.
The best solution is to abolish these provisions or at least significantly transform them.
The full version of the article is available in Ukrainian by the link.
Full text is open only for the subscribers.
SIMILAR POSTS
Better late than never: Legislators have finally decided to improve the rules on liability for correction of TP Reporting
1108
The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine has updated the list of low-tax jurisdictions
1560
The Multilateral Competent Authority Agreement on the Exchange of Country-by-Country Reports has entered into force for Ukraine: Implications for participants of MNE groups in Ukraine
776
Changes in the characteristics of non-resident counterparties for recognising transactions as controlled or making a 30% adjustment for corporate profit tax purposes
1835
Ukrainian Court Denies Characterization As Stewardship Expenses
877
Comparables Selection Was Correct After All, Ukrainian Court Says
434
Comparables Analysis Insufficient; Ukrainian Court Remands Case
1122
Ukraine: The War is not an excuse to ignore Transfer Pricing Compliance
1023
Finally! Ukraine has joined Multilateral Competent Authority Agreement on the Exchange of Country-by-Country Reports
1798
New decision of the Supreme Court of Ukraine regarding TP rules: new approaches to the application of the CUP method, but, unfortunately, questions still remain
2201
