Privatization of reclamation infrastructure and its impact on land rights
The article analyses the changes effective from June 21, 2026, under Law No. 4795-IX, which substantially revised Ukraine's legal framework for land reclamation infrastructure. It explains the distinction between a land reclamation system, a land reclamation network, network components and other system components, as well as the separate registration of rights to those assets. The article also shows why title to a pumping station, pipeline, or network does not, by itself, secure land rights, access to water, or the ability to operate the entire system.
The article outlines the available business models: constructing a private network, acquiring private infrastructure together with statutory succession under relevant service agreements, obtaining services from a state operator, participating through a water users organisation, privatising eligible unused state or municipal assets, or implementing a project through a public-private partnership or concession. It also reviews operator governance, investment programmes and the two-part tariff for water delivery services.
Particular attention is paid to practical risks. State and municipal land reclamation infrastructure cannot be leased, privatisation is subject to strict eligibility requirements, and technologically connected assets may carry hidden technical and financial liabilities. Investment agreements concluded outside the mandatory public-private partnership or concession framework may be void, including certain agreements executed before June 21, 2026. This may trigger disputes over restitution, compensation for investments and the constitutional prohibition on retroactive legislation.
Businesses should therefore verify project and passport documentation, cadastral and title records, land and access rights, technical integrity, water use permits, service agreements, tariff exposure and the legality of the selected investment model.
The full version of the article is available in Ukrainian by the link.
Full text is open only for the subscribers.
SIMILAR POSTS
Draft law on protecting the land rights of owners of real estate destroyed as a result of hostilities
582
The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court: Insignificant underpayment is not a ground for termination of land lease agreement
2060
The Prosecutor’s Office has been restricted in its right to reclaim land plots from bona fide owners, but special confiscation remains in effect
2754
Are land rights preserved after the repeal of the Commercial Code of Ukraine? Risks for the right of permanent use
1226
Reform of the State Land Cadastre of Ukraine: New opportunities or threats for landowners?
1340
Technical documentation on the restoration of boundaries as a method of manipulation during resolving land disputes
4027
How to buy agricultural land in Ukraine (without limitations)?
1857
Draft law on land consolidation
3192
How a disproportionate strengthening of the rights of tenants of agricultural land under the bill No. 2194 can turn against them and worsen the situation
3845
How to survive the inspection of the State GeoСadastre without losses
6204
Renewal of the land lease: is the implied consent of the landlord enough?
3318
What is worthy of note in Draft Law No. 2194 on deregulation of land relations?
13828
Leave a comment







