WTS Global Country TP Guide:
A comprehensive survey on Transfer Pricing from 73 countries
Since the publication of the final OECD BEPS reports, there has been a wave of local implementation initiatives. In light of these developments, WTS Global prepared a study demonstrating the implementation status of OECD BEPS 13 and related practical transfer pricing questions in more than 70 countries as of the end of the year 2017.
We would like to present to you global survey on TP documentation and related practical questions following numerous local OECD BEPS Action 13 implementation initiatives.
The following transfer pricing topics have been addressed in the survey:
- Legal TP documentation requirements and TP policies
- OECD BEPS Action 13 requirements
- TP disclosure and TP specific returns
- Benchmarking
- Year-end adjustments
- Transfer Pricing Audit and Dispute Resolution Mechanisms
Here are some of key findings:
- Study confirms a large-scale roll-out especially of CbCR. Various countries have already implemented the MF and LF documentation concept but to a lesser degree than CbCR. It is also apparent that several countries have tightened up rules on penalties for non-compliance. Specifically, in six countries, non-compliance with the CbCR requirements could lead to imprisonment.
- In almost all countries a large penalty and/or imprisonment is imposed, if a taxpayer files a tax return for which he understands or should understand that the result reported in that tax return is too low, due to incorrect transfer pricing. In many countries the same applies for the advisor/accountant/administrator who drafts and files the tax return of a client and understands or should understand that the result reported is too low due to incorrect transfer pricing.
- Local tax authorities focus on transfer pricing during tax audits, especially on the low hanging fruit such as loss making companies and intercompany charges for services. In addition an increased tax audit focus is seen on the remuneration of intellectual property and on intercompany financing. WTS Global expects an increased transfer pricing audit focus on financing, also given the discussion draft on financial transactions that has been issued by the OECD recently.
This survey will be updated on a regular basis. Updates will be available by the link.
Download pdf-file of the survey (3 Mb).
Kind regards,
SIMILAR POSTS
The Multilateral Competent Authority Agreement on the Exchange of Country-by-Country Reports has entered into force for Ukraine: Implications for participants of MNE groups in Ukraine
Changes in the characteristics of non-resident counterparties for recognising transactions as controlled or making a 30% adjustment for corporate profit tax purposes
Ukrainian Court Denies Characterization As Stewardship Expenses
Comparables Selection Was Correct After All, Ukrainian Court Says
Comparables Analysis Insufficient; Ukrainian Court Remands Case
“Massive” requests regarding application of the 30% adjustment on corporate income tax. What is wrong and what to do?
Ukraine: The War is not an excuse to ignore Transfer Pricing Compliance
Finally! Ukraine has joined Multilateral Competent Authority Agreement on the Exchange of Country-by-Country Reports
New decision of the Supreme Court of Ukraine regarding TP rules: new approaches to the application of the CUP method, but, unfortunately, questions still remain
Ukraine adopts new procedure on advance pricing agreements for transfer pricing purposes