Important transfer pricing court practice: the cassation appeal of the tax office has been (partially) satisfied again by the Supreme Court – why is the case important and what significant nuances have not been taken into account?
On August 10, 2023, the Supreme Court of Ukraine issued a decision in a case examining fundamental approaches to the transfer pricing analysis made under the net profit method, namely approaches to the selection of companies, on the basis of which the market range of profitability will be calculated.
In this case, the company selection approach used by the Taxpayer reflects the usual approach most taxpayers use.
However, the tax authorities' approach involved two additional non-standard criteria.
That is, a fundamental question of transfer pricing practice arises before the courts in this case: is it appropriate for the tax authorities to introduce additional criteria that significantly reduce the number of companies selected, and shift the range on the "pro-fiscal" direction?
Unfortunately, certain important aspects of the dispute were overlooked by the judges. Today, the "scales of Themis" are tipped in favor of the tax authorities. This can have negative consequences: during transfer pricing audits, tax authorities will begin to manipulate the selection criteria to achieve the desired results.
Therefore, the consideration of the dispute continues and there is hope that during the re-examination in the appellate court, a reasonable assessment of the tax authorities’ approach will be provided.
The full version of the article is available in Ukrainian by the link.
Full text is open only for the subscribers.
SIMILAR POSTS
Better late than never: Legislators have finally decided to improve the rules on liability for correction of TP Reporting
1922
The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine has updated the list of low-tax jurisdictions
3202
The Multilateral Competent Authority Agreement on the Exchange of Country-by-Country Reports has entered into force for Ukraine: Implications for participants of MNE groups in Ukraine
1109
Changes in the characteristics of non-resident counterparties for recognising transactions as controlled or making a 30% adjustment for corporate profit tax purposes
2575
Alexander Minin and Ivan Shynkarenko participated in the round table discussion “Tax and Customs Audits – Practice and Innovations” at AНK Ukraine
2100
Ukrainian Court Denies Characterization As Stewardship Expenses
1286
Alexander Minin and Ivan Shynkarenko spoke at the roundtable “Problems of exporters in time of war: regulatory challenges”
1280
Comparables Selection Was Correct After All, Ukrainian Court Says
773
Comparables Analysis Insufficient; Ukrainian Court Remands Case
1377
“Massive” requests regarding application of the 30% adjustment on corporate income tax. What is wrong and what to do?
3313
Ukraine: The War is not an excuse to ignore Transfer Pricing Compliance
1360
Leave a comment







