Changes in labor legislation: Draft Labor Code (Part 2)
We continue to analyze the key changes highlighted by the Ministry of Economy in the Draft Labor Code (Registry No. 14386).
In this part, we focus on changes related to hiring procedures and termination of employment contracts.
The new rules aim to simplify employees’ hiring procedures, ensure transparency, and protect workers’ rights, while creating a more predictable and controlled legal framework for employers.
The draft sets clear requirements for employment contracts and introduces updated approaches to termination, whether initiated by the employee or the employer.
These changes seek to balance flexibility for businesses with the protection of workers’ rights, and to prevent potential abuses in labor relations.
The full version of the article is available in Ukrainian by the link.
Kind regards,
SIMILAR POSTS
Criminal risks for businesses: Critical enterprise status, employee reservation, notifications and military transport obligations 
136
Reservation of persons liable for military service and personal military registration: The most common myths
129
Fund for Social Protection of Persons with Disabilities: Sanctions, the Fund’s inaction, and questionable conclusions of the Supreme Court
231
Employment quotas for persons with disabilities: Ukraine’s Supreme Court ruled in favor of representative offices
598
The company is included in the data verification schedule with the Territorial Recruitment and Social Support Center: What are the next steps?
680
Grounds for appealing the liability of a company official for violation of military registration rules
1471
Changes in labor legislation: Draft Labor Code (Part 4)
541
Changes in labor legislation: Draft Labor Code (Part 3)
618
Changes in labor legislation: Draft Labor Code (Part 1)
2505
Quota of workplaces for the employment of persons with disabilities: New rules effective from 2026
1337
Employment quota for persons with disabilities in representative offices: Where do the courts stand?
823
Even the Supreme Court can make a mistake – the term “employer” is misapplied in the context of meeting the quota for employing persons with disabilities
1416
Leave a comment