+ Word must be in search result. - Words must not be in search result. * Word start/end on characters before/after symbol. ""Words in quotes will be searched as phrase.


Ukrainian customs regime of inward processing: Is there a need of “crush-test” for the applied business model?

18 May, 2017 Exclusive

Why are we talking about the risks?

Ukrainian customs regime of inward processing is widely used in business today. It is not surprising, because this regime has obvious advantages. It allows importing raw materials for processing with relief from the customs duties and VAT on condition that the finished products are exported from the customs territory of Ukraine within established terms.

Yet, as is usual in economics, the benefits go hand-in-hand with the risks. Thus, regime of inward processing, if canceled, would result in significant tax charges – actually all customs payments on raw materials, brought under relief. Moreover, the fiscal authorities may cancel this regime during the post clearance audit.

The fact that such risks actually exist in practice has been recently confirmed in practice. Thus, in 2016, the fiscal authority applied record assessments as per results of post-clearance audit of Ukrainian company of the renowned manufacturer of tobacco products. Based on public statements of representatives of the State Fiscal Service (hereinafter — "the SFS"), the overall amount of additional charges, expressed by ten-digit number, was caused by the alleged violation of conditions of application of Ukrainian customs regime of inward processing.

Is this a call for business about the need to check existing models of production in Ukraine using the customs regime of inward processing? What features of the model would require special attention?

Let us try to find out.



Full text is open only for the subscribers.

Views 1761


Customs value disputes: a review of recent decisions of the Supreme Court 15 April, 2021    1553

Authorized Economic Operators (AEO): who can get this status? 14 January, 2020    2162

Updating the procedure of customs clearance under the Law on Authorized Economic Operators 16 December, 2019    934

Has the Supreme Court legitimated transit cars with euro-numbers? 23 October, 2018    2120

“The state has no responsibility for anything it does” (interview of partners at KM Partners for Yurydychna Gazeta) 21 June, 2018    3940

Controlling authorities without powers, or what do the euphemisms in lawmaking lead to (customs post-audit is currently illegal?) 20 March, 2018    1103

Remuneration of the resident forwarding agent and customs value. To include or not to include – that is the question. Or not a question anymore? 24 July, 2017    3029

What should be done with the Ukrainian customs system? 27 June, 2017    1492

Draft of the amendments to the Procedure for the inclusion of royalties/license fees in the customs value. What`s new? 21 June, 2017    1437

Your goods may be brought to occupied territories from other countries? Then get ready to suspension of foreign economic activity in Ukraine 26 May, 2017    1732

Transfer pricing and customs valuation: touch points and how business can use them 10 March, 2017    5873

Practice of the High Administrative Court of Ukraine on customs issues for 2016. Where do head for? 08 February, 2017    1302