+ Word must be in search result. - Words must not be in search result. * Word start/end on characters before/after symbol. ""Words in quotes will be searched as phrase.

 

“Massive” requests regarding application of the 30% adjustment on corporate income tax. What is wrong and what to do?

authors: Alexander Minin, Ivan Shynkarenko

03 August, 2023 Exclusive

The rule on 30% adjustment to the amount of the value of goods (works, services) purchased from non-residents from the lists of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine has been provided for in paragraph 140.5.4 of the Tax Code of Ukraine since 2015.

Law 466-IX, which entered into force on May 23, 2020, added to the Tax Code of Ukraine the provision 140.5.5-1 that extended 30% adjustment of the financial result to transactions for the sale of goods (works, services).

In essence, such provisions extend the requirement to justify the compliance with the "arm's length" principle to transactions with non-residents from the lists of the Cabinet of Ministers, both with related and unrelated parties.

At the same time, provisions regarding 30% adjustment and the practice of their application do not correspond to the primary purpose of their introduction as they put hardly justifiable burden on a significant number of taxpayers, as well as the burden on tax authorities in terms of tax administration.

In addition, these provisions do not correspond to the general principles of taxation, in particular the principles of economic efficiency and neutrality.

The best solution is to abolish these provisions or at least significantly transform them.

The full version of the article is available in Ukrainian by the link.

 

Full text is open only for the subscribers.

Views 797

SIMILAR POSTS

Comparables Selection Was Correct After All, Ukrainian Court Says 11 April, 2024    67

The case Olympex Coupe International v. State Tax Service: the Supreme Court of Ukraine has finally decided to disallow the tax office’s “creative” application of the transactional net margin method 01 March, 2024    363

Important transfer pricing court practice: the cassation appeal of the tax office has been (partially) satisfied again by the Supreme Court – why is the case important and what significant nuances have not been taken into account? 13 November, 2023    556

Comparables Analysis Insufficient; Ukrainian Court Remands Case 18 September, 2023    216

Ukraine: The War is not an excuse to ignore Transfer Pricing Compliance 06 February, 2023    545

Finally! Ukraine has joined Multilateral Competent Authority Agreement on the Exchange of Country-by-Country Reports 09 November, 2022    883

New decision of the Supreme Court of Ukraine regarding TP rules: new approaches to the application of the CUP method, but, unfortunately, questions still remain 05 October, 2022    1130

Ukraine adopts new procedure on advance pricing agreements for transfer pricing purposes 19 November, 2021    749

Ukraine Ministry of Finance clarifies general tax consultation on deemed dividends 01 October, 2021    1256

Ministry of Finance of Ukraine clarifies some TP issues 16 June, 2021    2065

SUPREME COURT: DEMAND ON RECOGNITION OF INCOME FROM LONG-TERM DEBT DISCOUNTING IS ILLEGAL 27 May, 2021    4620

Ukraine’s new transfer pricing rules expand taxpayer obligations 19 May, 2021    11108

Comment