+ Word must be in search result. - Words must not be in search result. * Word start/end on characters before/after symbol. ""Words in quotes will be searched as phrase.

 

Decriminalization of tax evasions on amount < UAH 2 881 500
Retroactivity of the effective version of Article 212 of the Criminal Code

author: Antonina Gorodetska

11 October, 2019 Exclusive

As known, the provisions of the Law of Ukraine On Amendments to the Criminal Code of Ukraine and the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine on Reducing Pressure on Business as of September 18, 2019 No. 101-IX (hereinafter – the Law No. 101-IX) came into force on September 25, 2019.

Within the public and among lawyers, the Law No. 101-IX is better known as the "Law on Decriminalization of Sham Business" considering that according to its provisions Article 205 “Sham Business” was excluded from the Criminal Code of Ukraine (hereinafter - the Criminal Code).

However, the actual decriminalization of part 1 of Article 212 of the Criminal Code in the version effective until September 25, 2019 was unreasonably left unattended. In particular, according to the previous version of Article 212 of the Criminal Code the following thresholds for criminal liability were set forth:

That is, the “starting point” for bringing a person to liability for tax evasion in 2019 was non-receipt by the budget of taxes in amount of UAH 960,500.

Meanwhile, Article 212 of the Criminal Code was amended by the Law No. 101-IX, and the following thresholds for criminal liability are set as of today:

That is, as of today ...

 

Full text is open only for the subscribers.

Views 5737

SIMILAR POSTS

Tax authorities’ requests abroad: taxation risks in transactions with non-residents 06 May, 2025    541

Documents from territorial recruitment centers, tax authorities, or customs are sent by post but not actually delivered: How this can cause problems for the recepient 14 March, 2025    411

The Multilateral Competent Authority Agreement on the Exchange of Country-by-Country Reports has entered into force for Ukraine: Implications for participants of MNE groups in Ukraine 07 November, 2024    758

The “false bottom” of the Draft Law on communication between business and tax authorities No. 9662 15 March, 2024    895

Where to find the true law? OR
How to determine valid provisions of the Tax Code at the particular time period?
19 January, 2024    1413

It didn’t go well: “Amendments of Lozovyi” were partially canceled 14 December, 2023    1218

An attempt to cancel “amendments of Lozovyi”– business, stand by! 14 November, 2023    1419

Terms of pre-trial investigation in wartime: has the Law No. 3341-IX dotted the i’s and crossed the t’s? 11 October, 2023    35864

Alexander Minin delivered report in the XII Tax Forum of the Ukrainian Bar Association 28 September, 2023    938

Terms of pre-trial investigation [in ALL criminal proceedings, where no one was notified of suspicion], are terminated until the end of martial law. But what if to get a new angle on? 18 August, 2023    4727

Is a taxpayer entitled to submit to the court documents, which were not previously provided to the tax authority, and is there a ground for the court to disregard these documents? 15 May, 2023    4362

The status of “risky”: To appeal or not to appeal? 23 November, 2022    10177

Comment