+ Word must be in search result. - Words must not be in search result. * Word start/end on characters before/after symbol. ""Words in quotes will be searched as phrase.

 

Decriminalization of tax evasions on amount < UAH 2 881 500
Retroactivity of the effective version of Article 212 of the Criminal Code

author: Antonina Gorodetska

11 October, 2019 Exclusive

As known, the provisions of the Law of Ukraine On Amendments to the Criminal Code of Ukraine and the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine on Reducing Pressure on Business as of September 18, 2019 No. 101-IX (hereinafter – the Law No. 101-IX) came into force on September 25, 2019.

Within the public and among lawyers, the Law No. 101-IX is better known as the "Law on Decriminalization of Sham Business" considering that according to its provisions Article 205 “Sham Business” was excluded from the Criminal Code of Ukraine (hereinafter - the Criminal Code).

However, the actual decriminalization of part 1 of Article 212 of the Criminal Code in the version effective until September 25, 2019 was unreasonably left unattended. In particular, according to the previous version of Article 212 of the Criminal Code the following thresholds for criminal liability were set forth:

That is, the “starting point” for bringing a person to liability for tax evasion in 2019 was non-receipt by the budget of taxes in amount of UAH 960,500.

Meanwhile, Article 212 of the Criminal Code was amended by the Law No. 101-IX, and the following thresholds for criminal liability are set as of today:

That is, as of today ...

 

Full text is open only for the subscribers.

Views 6357

SIMILAR POSTS

“Constructive dividends”: Is the amount exceeding the arm’s length price of goods purchased from a non-resident subject to non-resident income tax under the Tax Code of Ukraine? 11 June, 2026    175

Alexander Minin and Ivan Shynkarenko spoke at the АНК Ukraine webinar “Navigating Ukraine’s Tax and Customs Systems” 28 May, 2026    103

Is the status of a tax agent absolute?
(An analysis of inconsistent case law in disputes between pawnshops and tax authorities)
04 May, 2026    262

Fault and illegality in tax violations: Controversial approaches in the practice of unscheduled tax audits 23 April, 2026    413

How are discrepancies in the texts of different language versions addressed when applying double tax treaties? 22 April, 2026    430

Filing a claim via the Electronic Cabinet: Can attorneys confirm their authority in electronic form and reliably obtain a ruling on the opening of administrative proceedings? 24 February, 2026    1679

“Where to find the true law” update: Repealed provision finally removed from the consolidated Tax Code on the Parliament’s website 12 February, 2026    442

Procedural pressure 14 January, 2026    264

Accounting and/or tax compliance outsourcing: Does it exempt the taxpayer from responsibility for possible errors? 04 December, 2025    536

Documents during tax audits vs. evidence in tax disputes 31 October, 2025    724

Alexander Minin and Yuliia Kryvomaz spoke at the XIV Tax Forum of the Ukrainian Bar Association 31 October, 2025    538

Additional capital in Ukrainian TOVs (LLCs): Is it now easier or harder for tax purposes? 24 September, 2025    1834

Comment