+ Word must be in search result. - Words must not be in search result. * Word start/end on characters before/after symbol. ""Words in quotes will be searched as phrase.

 

New rules on business purpose in Ukraine
Test introduced in 2020 has been revised with effect from 2021

author: Ivan Shynkarenko

source: "WTS Klient"

09 March, 2021 Press

Last year, the regulation of business purpose was changed two times in Ukraine. Law 466-IX, which supplemented the definition of reasonable economic purpose and introduced the application of the business purpose test to any purchases from non-residents, came into force in May 2020. With effect from 1 January 2021, these rules were amended later by Law 1117-IX. According to these amendments, now instead of targeting all transactions with non-residents, the test is applicable only to transactions that are subject to TP control, royalty payments and transactions with non-residents that fall under the list of “low tax” states (territories) or the list of organizational forms of non-residents. However, still a lot of Ukrainian taxpayers are targeted, especially Ukrainian affiliates of multinational companies.

Definition of business purpose according to Law 466-IX

Ukrainian Tax Code has contained the definition of the reasonable economic purpose (business aim) of transactions since its adoption back in 2010. Yet, this definition was unclear, and the ways of its practical application were limited.

Law 466-IX, which came into force in May 2020, introduced comprehensive changes into the Tax Code of Ukraine, including implementation of BEPS three-tier reporting standard. Alongside these important changes, the rules on business purpose were amended as well.

According to the definition, “reasonable economic purpose (business aim)” is the purpose that may occur on condition that a taxpayer aims at reaching certain economic goal in the result of business activity. Law 466-IX supplemented this definition with the explanation on what such economic goal may be and what transactions should be deemed as not having “reasonable economic purpose”. An economic goal (effect) particularly but without limitation should mean increase (saving) of the taxpayer’s assets and/or of their value in future.

At the same time, for taxation purposes, a transaction with non-resident is considered not have a reasonable economic purpose if:

  • its principal aim or one of them is non-payment (underpayment) of taxes and/or decrease of the profit tax base;
  • in comparable circumstances an entity would not be prepared to sell (purchase) such goods, works or services, intangible assets, or other items to (from) an unrelated party.

The Law 466-IX also specified how the business purpose test may impact the tax position.

Thus, new adjustment of the profit tax base was introduced into Article 140.5 of the Ukrainian Tax Code. According to it, the taxpayer shall increase the amount of taxable profit by the amount of expenses, incurred in transactions with non-residents if such transactions lack business purpose. The burden of proof in this case is levied on the tax office.

In other words, in the version of Law 466-IX, the test was applicable to any purchases from non-residents. And if the tax office challenges the reasonable economic purpose, such expenses may be disregarded when calculating the profit tax base.

Amendments by Law 1117-IX

However, such rules were amended by the Law 1117-IX, which came in force on 1 January 2021. According to these amendments, the test is applicable only to transactions with non-residents subject to transfer pricing (TP) control, transactions on payment of royalty, and transactions with non-residents that fall under the list of “low tax” states (territories) or the list of organizational forms of non-residents (covering fiscally transparent entities), adopted by the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine.

The Law also introduced the changes to the way of application of the test in Ukraine. Thus, in terms of TP control, the analysis of the business purpose was extended and now also implies analysis of the alternative options available to the parties acting with commercial rationality if they were not related. In addition to non-recognition of a transaction for taxation purposes, the tax authorities received the right to substitute the conditions of the transaction between related parties with an alternative transaction they deem commercially rational given the facts of the case.

New business purpose test rules for transactions with non-residents that fall under the list of “low tax” states (territories) or the list of organizational forms of non-residents (covering fiscally transparent entities) will be in force from 1 January 2022.

According to the current rules transactions with such non-residents are subject to special 30% adjustment. This adjustment means that the profit tax base should be increased by 30% of the value of the goods (services) purchased from or supplied to such non-residents unless taxpayers proves that the relations are at arm’s length (although such transactions are not subject to standard TP rules).

From 2022 the Ukrainian tax authority will receive the right to also control the business purpose of such transactions. And in case the tax authority finds that a transaction lacks reasonable economic purpose, the profit tax base would be increased by the entire value of the goods (services) thus purchased or supplied. In other words, absence of the business purpose would effectively mean 100% adjustment on transactions with such listed non-residents.

It is advisable not to ignore these new rules and get properly prepared as the tax implications may be material.

Download pdf-file of the article (23 Mb)

Views 612

SIMILAR POSTS

Ministry of Finance of Ukraine clarifies some TP issues 16 June, 2021    565

Ukraine’s new transfer pricing rules expand taxpayer obligations 19 May, 2021    561

Changes regarding form of the Report on controlled transactions and the Order of its filling 25 March, 2021    570

Country-by-Country Reporting: Form and procedure of submission 05 March, 2021    956

Transfer Pricing reporting for 2020: what else you should know 19 February, 2021    591

The Coca-Cola’s billion dollar loss in Transfer Pricing dispute with US tax authorities over royalties, or why taxpayers shouldn’t be overoptimistic about agreements with the state 17 February, 2021    889

Thank you for not approving it on the 31th of December! The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine has approved a list of raw-material goods that fall under the TP scope 16 December, 2020    1219

The Law No. 466-IX stipulates that the income of individuals from certain transactions with investment assets is calculated at normal prices. What does it mean? 16 October, 2020    850

New proportionate TP adjustment rules introduced into Ukrainian tax law since May 2020 06 October, 2020    638

Another reincarnation of the special TP rules regarding raw materials. Will it work this time? 09 September, 2020    1927

Development of TP control over PEs in Ukraine: new rules apply to profit calculations from May 2020 26 August, 2020    3693

Transfer Pricing and the Law No. 466-IX: Review of the most important changes 09 June, 2020    1376

Comment