On the issue of possible tactics and updating approaches to court proceedings regarding «sham transactions»
For a long period of time disputes over so-called "void agreements" have been the most notorious disputes with tax authorities. The notion does not precisely define this category of disputes, but it has been always applied to. This refers to the refusal of tax authorities to declare the tax credit and/or expenses on transactions with contractors, which directors/participants are involved in criminal proceedings under Art. 205 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine "Fictitious business activity".
In this newsletter, we will analyze some elements of possible approaches to the court consideration of such disputes, which practical application is not widespread at present. However, we expect that its application may greatly improve the taxpayer’s position and facilitate a fair court consideration of such disputes.
(i) ...
Full text is open only for the subscribers.
SIMILAR POSTS
The “false bottom” of the Draft Law on communication between business and tax authorities No. 9662
It didn’t go well: “Amendments of Lozovyi” were partially canceled
Thresholds of criminal liability under Article 212 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine in 2024
An attempt to cancel “amendments of Lozovyi”– business, stand by!
Terms of pre-trial investigation in wartime: has the Law No. 3341-IX dotted the i’s and crossed the t’s?
Terms of pre-trial investigation [in ALL criminal proceedings, where no one was notified of suspicion], are terminated until the end of martial law. But what if to get a new angle on?
“When was that?” — “Many moons ago”, or where to find witnesses to consider the case which has been sent for a new trial
In light of the recent court practice regarding sham transactions: what evidence should be collected?
The District Administrative Court of Kyiv will be liquidated. What does this mean for the parties whose cases are under consideration in the court?
The status of “risky”: To appeal or not to appeal?