Decriminalization of tax evasions on amount < UAH 2 881 500
Retroactivity of the effective version of Article 212 of the Criminal Code
As known, the provisions of the Law of Ukraine On Amendments to the Criminal Code of Ukraine and the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine on Reducing Pressure on Business as of September 18, 2019 No. 101-IX (hereinafter – the Law No. 101-IX) came into force on September 25, 2019.
Within the public and among lawyers, the Law No. 101-IX is better known as the "Law on Decriminalization of Sham Business" considering that according to its provisions Article 205 “Sham Business” was excluded from the Criminal Code of Ukraine (hereinafter - the Criminal Code).
However, the actual decriminalization of part 1 of Article 212 of the Criminal Code in the version effective until September 25, 2019 was unreasonably left unattended. In particular, according to the previous version of Article 212 of the Criminal Code the following thresholds for criminal liability were set forth:
That is, the “starting point” for bringing a person to liability for tax evasion in 2019 was non-receipt by the budget of taxes in amount of UAH 960,500.
Meanwhile, Article 212 of the Criminal Code was amended by the Law No. 101-IX, and the following thresholds for criminal liability are set as of today:
That is, as of today ...
Full text is open only for the subscribers.
SIMILAR POSTS
The “false bottom” of the Draft Law on communication between business and tax authorities No. 9662 
338
Where to find the true law? OR
How to determine valid provisions of the Tax Code at the particular time period?
301
It didn’t go well: “Amendments of Lozovyi” were partially canceled
330
Thresholds of criminal liability under Article 212 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine in 2024
746
An attempt to cancel “amendments of Lozovyi”– business, stand by!
369
Terms of pre-trial investigation in wartime: has the Law No. 3341-IX dotted the i’s and crossed the t’s?
368
Alexander Minin delivered report in the XII Tax Forum of the Ukrainian Bar Association
269
Terms of pre-trial investigation [in ALL criminal proceedings, where no one was notified of suspicion], are terminated until the end of martial law. But what if to get a new angle on?
1099
The status of “risky”: To appeal or not to appeal?
1266
The tax authorities will not pay a court fee when applying to the court for recovering a tax debt and Unified Social Contribution debt
516
Amendments to the list of documentary off-plan audits, which are allowed to be carried out for the period before the termination or cancellation of martial law
831
Leave a comment