Analytics

SIMILAR POSTS

The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court “broke” the unfair practice of evaluating a sentence under Article 205 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine regarding the director of the taxpayer’s contractor 31 August, 2022    441

Decriminalization of “sham business activity”: what`s on practice? 02 December, 2019    2538

Decriminalization of Art. 205 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine and changes to Art. 212 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine – increasing of taxes non-payment thresholds that may lead to criminal prosecution
What are the practical implications for current cases? 26 September, 2019    21652

To prove guilt impossible to convict
Whether the taxpayer is liable for his contractor’s violations 21 March, 2019    2207

Should we trust the verdicts and other decisions in criminal proceedings under Art. 205 of the CC of Ukraine? 12 December, 2018    2198

On the issue of possible tactics and updating approaches to court proceedings regarding «sham transactions» 30 November, 2018    1727

How to evaluate the inaction of the tax authority regarding the termination of shady contractors in the light of disputes over “sham transactions” 28 November, 2018    1928

Is the practice of the Supreme Court formed if there is Art. 205 of the Criminal Code concerning the contractor? 21 August, 2018    3535

“The fifth wheel to the coach”, or what is Art. 205 of the Criminal Code in practice for? 27 June, 2018    2172

Every one is free 16 April, 2018    1762

The real goal of verdicts under Article 205 of the Criminal Code: are there any purposes of this article? 06 April, 2018    5034

Updating! The case for “forming a single law enforcement practice” regarding the assessment of the verdict under Art. 205 of the Criminal Code in relation to the director of the counteragent was transferred for consideration of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court 23 March, 2018    3871