Delaying VAT refund by tax audits: is this lawful?
Recently the issue of VAT refund gets even hotter for business as indicated by a number of publications on the media and social networks1. According to the statistics of the State Tax Service, as of April 1, 20202, the amount of VAT claimed for refund is over UAH 60 billion, of which UAH 19.8 billion has not been reimbursed.
Particularly recently, we see in practice the efforts of tax authorities to delay refund of the VAT amount, or at least a part of it, including through the conduction of documentary tax audits, which allegedly establish the overstatement of the VAT amounts for refund.
In such cases, the amount cannot be returned within the period of administrative and judicial appeal, which usually takes 1.5-2 years, given the current workload of the courts; corresponding VAT refund is in dispute and only after this the VAT amount shall be returned again to the status “for refund”.
It seems that the balancing of the State budget is not least ensured by transferring the VAT claimed for refund to the category of disputed. By the way, according to the statistics of the State Tax Service, only for March the quantity of declined amounts claimed for refund increased up to UAH 258 million (general quantity of declined amounts is UAH 1,071 billion as of April 01, 2020).
Currently, the only “gap” for conduction of documentary tax audits for the period till May 31, 2020, is unscheduled documentary tax audits on the grounds specified in subpara. 78.1.8 of para. 78.1 of Article 78 of the Tax Code of Ukraine ( “the Tax Code”).
And even before, the corresponding tax audits have been conducted with reference to subpara. 78.1.8 of para. 78.1 of Article 78 of the Tax Code.
The question is, how far this can be resisted and how “legitimate”, at least on the formal side, such actions of tax service should be considered? ...
Full text is open only for the subscribers.
The season for tax audits on compliance with currency legislation in the part of settlement deadlines for export and import transactions has been opened
Has the Supreme Court recognized the right of the tax authorities to disregard the requirements of the Constitution without the legal consequences of such a deviation? Well not in all cases (Part one)
Separate opinion of the Judges of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court of Ukraine as of September 8, 2021, regarding the erroneous conclusion of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court on the impossibility of the tax audit order to be the subject of an independent appeal in court
Resolution of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court of Ukraine as of September 8, 2021 on the impossibility of appealing the order to conduct a tax audit after admission to the audit
Have you formed a VAT tax credit in relation to the purchase of marketing services? Be ready to answer the questions of the tax authorities about using such services in economic activity.
The System of Electronic Administration of Fuel Sales – how the “shadow” was tempered
How “the state in the smartphone” works with VAT refund as an example
What changes does the Draft Law No. 5600 propose?
Draft law No. 5600 abolishes restrictions on audits of VAT refunds.
And what is the electronical VAT administration system for? (are we going back from the “State in Smartphone” to hands-on control of VAT?)
Thoughts on the draft law No. 5600: tax lien for non-confirmed liabilities – why is it better for the legislator to give up the idea?
The balance of interests – R.I.P. (the draft law No. 5600)
Deviations of government agencies from the requirements of laws: What the taxpayers shall do with this