Beginning of the Law on tax reform as a characteristic sign
It is well known, that the first impression is the most lasting. It establishes perception largely and, as practice shows, this impression is quite accurate.
From this perspective it is interesting to take a view of the Law on “tax reform” – the Law of Ukraine “On Amendments to the Tax Code of Ukraine and some legislative acts of Ukraine” as of 28.12.2014 # 71-VIII, which begins with:
“I. To amend the Tax Code of Ukraine (Record of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 2011, NN 13-17, Article 112) with the following:
1) to restate para. 8.3 of Article 8 in the following version:
“8.3. Local taxes and fees, which are set in compliance with the list and within the limit rates as specified by this Code, rural and municipal councils according to their authorities, are mandatory for payment on the territories of respective communities”;
And what was the version before para 8.3.“has been reformed”?
It was the following:
“8.3. Local taxes and fees, which are set in compliance with the list and within the limit rates as specified by this Code, rural and municipal councils according to their authorities, are mandatory for payment on the territories of respective communities”.
Find the difference!
You will never make it, because they are the same.
And indeed you will never find proper tax reform as it is in this Law.
The above commentary presents the general statement for information purposes only and as such may not be practically used in specific cases without professional advice.
Kind regards,
SIMILAR POSTS
Penalties for violation in cash circulation sphere. Is everything so bad?
2478
Q&A with Alexander Minin of KM Partners, 2019 “Law Firm of the Year” Winner in Ukraine
2093
Is ATO over?
Or “I’ve brought you a package… But I will not give it to you”
11026
YOU ARE BIRDS OF A FEATHER
6387
The right for renewal of terms for appeal vs. res judicata principle
34430
The Supreme Court ordered the first «exemplary» decision in the taxes cases
3734
The court ruling of the Court of Cassation as the Supreme Court as of February 21, 2018
4736
Abuse of procedural rights. The first сourt practice of applying the provisions of the CAPU
5379
Who is the owner of the country?
5417
The first “tax” decision of the renewed Constitutional Court of Ukraine
5377
Introduction of preliminary control over the registration of tax invoices and automatic budgetary refund
1661
Review of the court practice of the courts of cassation on important (problematic) issues related to taxation for 2017
2498
