The Supreme Court has finally “heard” the arguments of taxpayers regarding the issue of establishing the “reality” of business transactions (and not only about that)
Kind regards,
SIMILAR POSTS
“When was that?” — “Many moons ago”, or where to find witnesses to consider the case which has been sent for a new trial
2677
In light of the recent court practice regarding sham transactions: what evidence should be collected?
2633
Decriminalization of “sham business activity”: what`s on practice?
5515
To prove guilt impossible to convict
Whether the taxpayer is liable for his contractor’s violations
3721
Should we trust the verdicts and other decisions in criminal proceedings under Art. 205 of the CC of Ukraine?
5028
On the issue of possible tactics and updating approaches to court proceedings regarding «sham transactions»
3168
How to evaluate the inaction of the tax authority regarding the termination of shady contractors in the light of disputes over “sham transactions”
2974
Is the practice of the Supreme Court formed if there is Art. 205 of the Criminal Code concerning the contractor?
4759
“The fifth wheel to the coach”, or what is Art. 205 of the Criminal Code in practice for?
3332
Every one is free
2715
Leave a comment







