+ Word must be in search result. - Words must not be in search result. * Word start/end on characters before/after symbol. ""Words in quotes will be searched as phrase.

 

The importance of being consistent

01 March, 2019 Newsletters

The Constitutional Court of Ukraine ruled Article 368-2 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine unconstitutional. One of the grounds was the conclusion, that provisions of Article 368-2 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine do not comply with the “quality” of the law.

Given that Article 212 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (tax evasion) has significant quality problems, the ruling of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine in case No. 1-р/2019 creates such conditions, that Article 212 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine may be ruled unconstitutional.

More details on “quality” problems of Article 212 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine are available by the link.

Below we provide legal grounds stated in the ruling of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine, which can be used to declare unconstitutional any provision of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, that does not comply with the “law quality”:

The Ruling of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine as of February 26, 2019 in case No. 1-р/2019

“<…>

3. Legal certainty is one of the main elements of the rule of law principle stipulated in part 1 of Article 8 of the Ukrainian Fundamental Law. The Constitutional Court of Ukraine underlined the importance to demand the certainty, clarity and unambiguousness of the legal provision, since otherwise cannot provide its equal application and does not eliminate an undefined interpretation within the law enforcement practice, and inevitably leads to the iniquity (paragraph 2 of subpara. 5.4 of para. 5 of the analytical part of Ruling as of September 22, 2005 in case No. 5-рп/2005).

The European Court of Human Rights in its judgement in case of Soldatenko v. Ukraine as of October 23, 2008 stated, that when it comes to liberty deprivation – the extremely important condition is the provision of legal certainty general principle, and also emphasized, that para. 1 of Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights as of 1950 does not just give the reference to the national law, but relates to the “law quality”, requiring the law to comply with the rule of law principle; herewith, the “law quality” means, that when the national law foresees the possibility of liberty deprivation, such a law shall be sufficiently available, precise and foreseeable in its application for the purpose of elimination of the any risk of iniquity (para. 111).

Meeting the requirements of clarity and unambiguousness of legal provisions, that provide criminal responsibility, is particularly important in terms of the special nature of a criminal law and consequences of bringing to criminal responsibility, since bringing to such a kind of criminal responsibility is related to possible significant restrictions of human rights and freedoms.

<…>

… criminal charges cannot be based on illegally gathered evidences, as well as on assumptions; all and any assumptions related to proof of an individual’s guilt shall be interpreted in an individual’s favor (part 1, 2, 3 of Article 62 of the Constitution of Ukraine).

5.

<…>

Given the above, the Constitutional Court of Ukraine concluded that Article 3682 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine does not comply with requirements of clarity, precision and unambiguousness, therefore, it contradicts to the legal certainty being a part of rule of law principle stipulated in Article 8 of the Constitution of Ukraine.

<…>

7. While solving this case the Constitutional Court of Ukraine proceeds from the fact that the legislative definition of the features of illegal enrichment, given in Article 3682 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, does not comply with a legal certainty principle.

Ukraine, as a state governed by the rule of law according to Article 1 of the Constitution of Ukraine, shall provide crime prevention exclusively by legal means with the strict compliance with human rights and freedoms. This fully applies to the implementation of the exclusive legislative function of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine in terms of legal determination of actions deemed to be criminal offences (para. 22 of part 1 of Article 92 of the Constitution of Ukraine). In such events, when the law foresees the criminal responsibility, the requirement of clarity and unambiguousness of such a law is crucial in determining its compliance with a legal certainty.

Therefore, the Constitutional Court of Ukraine concluded, that Article 3682 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine does not comply with the requirement of a legal certainty being a part of rule of law constitutional principle (part 1 of Article 8 of the Constitution of Ukraine), since the description of this legal provision is not clearly formulated and allows for ambiguous understanding, interpretation
and application”.

The above commentary presents the general statement for information purposes only and as such may not be practically used in specific cases without professional advice.

Kind regards,

© WTS Consulting LLC, 2019

Views 574

SIMILAR POSTS

Thresholds of criminal liability for Unified Social Tax evasion (under Art. 212-1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine) in 2019 17 July, 2019    172

Increased liability on tax evasion
and some other crimes,
and
some other important changes of the Law on Amendments on Simplifying the Pre-Trial Investigation of Certain Categories of Criminal Offences
14 May, 2019    525

How to Distinguish between Disputable Tax Matters and Criminal Tax Evasion 26 March, 2019    642

Criminal proceedings on tax evasion in 2018 – what was year-end closing? 26 March, 2019    745

Thresholds of criminal liability under Art. 212 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine in 2019 09 January, 2019    31501

Should we trust the verdicts and other decisions in criminal proceedings under Art. 205 of the CC of Ukraine? 12 December, 2018    909

On the issue of possible tactics and updating approaches to court proceedings regarding «sham transactions» 30 November, 2018    865

Statistics on criminal proceedings regarding Art. 212 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine within 9 months of 2018 30 October, 2018    1282

Cassation Administrative Court is applying to the Grand Chamber: urgent questions and results 26 September, 2018    1437

Judgments of the Supreme Court in tax disputes under Art. 205 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine concerning the contractor (the first 8 months) 21 August, 2018    697

Is the practice of the Supreme Court formed if there is Art. 205 of the Criminal Code concerning the contractor? 21 August, 2018    2965

Criminal proceedings on tax evasion: statistics and verdicts within first half of 2018 17 August, 2018    1067

Comment