Criminal proceedings on tax evasion upon results of tax audit and dispute when the tax liabilities remain NOT settled
With the resumption of tax audits, criminal proceedings for alleged tax evasion have become more frequent, even when the tax liabilities are still not settled or in dispute.
Under the law (Part 1 of Article 212 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine), liability arises only for malicious tax evasion, meaning there must be an actual failure for the funds to reach the budget and the presence of intent. If the tax liability is disputed, the fact of “non-payment of taxes” may legally be absent — making criminal prosecution in such cases questionable.
In theory, an act of tax audit itself is not a statement of a crime and, by law, should not be automatically referred to law enforcement before the liabilities are settled. However, in practice this often occurs: law enforcement initiates cases even while the dispute is still ongoing or before the tax notice is issued — that is, before the debt “officially” arises.
A possible reason is the use of criminal proceedings as leverage on businesses — to pressure them into paying the assessments or to “improve the statistics” of tax and law-enforcement agencies on filling in the budget. Law enforcement officers often suggest that taxpayers pay the amounts (even disputed or non-existent ones) “before charges are filed” to benefit from Part 4 of Article 212 of the Criminal Code and avoid criminal liability.
It is therefore important to carefully assess whether to pay disputed amounts, and if yes — how and when — to avoid criminal liability, or to pursue the matter through tax disputes — while fully considering the associated risks.
The full version of the article is available in Ukrainian by the link.
Kind regards,
SIMILAR POSTS
Alexander Minin and Ivan Shynkarenko spoke at the АНК Ukraine event “Tax audits of businesses: How to prepare and what to expect”
496
Statute of limitations: Restrictions for tax audits, application of sanctions, tax documents retention, and the impact of COVID/martial law
1167
Tax audits: Types, criteria, and grounds for initiation
688
Renewal of tax audits: what shall be considered before deciding on allowing the tax authority to conduct the tax audit and during the tax audit?
940
Proving the status of a non-resident as a beneficial owner of income: what circumstances did the Supreme Court pay attention to
1417
Alexander Minin and Ivan Shynkarenko participated in the round table discussion “Tax and Customs Audits – Practice and Innovations” at AНK Ukraine
2038
Documentary customs audits are back: the Law has been promulgated
1692
Is it impossible to challenge the tax audit orders even if they are issued in the absence of legal grounds? Should the taxpayer bite the bullet and tolerate the tax audit?
3036
Scheduled documentary tax audit in 2024 appointed with the reference to low (compared to industry average) level of tax payment is illegal!
1613
Yuliia Kryvomaz spoke at the online event of the Ukrainian Bar Association dedicated to recent court practice in tax dispute resolution
945
Leave a comment







