+ Word must be in search result. - Words must not be in search result. * Word start/end on characters before/after symbol. ""Words in quotes will be searched as phrase.

 

Criminal proceedings on tax evasion upon results of tax audit and dispute when the tax liabilities remain NOT settled

12 November, 2025 Newsletters

With the resumption of tax audits, criminal proceedings for alleged tax evasion have become more frequent, even when the tax liabilities are still not settled or in dispute.

Under the law (Part 1 of Article 212 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine), liability arises only for malicious tax evasion, meaning there must be an actual failure for the funds to reach the budget and the presence of intent. If the tax liability is disputed, the fact of “non-payment of taxes” may legally be absent — making criminal prosecution in such cases questionable.

In theory, an act of tax audit itself is not a statement of a crime and, by law, should not be automatically referred to law enforcement before the liabilities are settled. However, in practice this often occurs: law enforcement initiates cases even while the dispute is still ongoing or before the tax notice is issued — that is, before the debt “officially” arises.

A possible reason is the use of criminal proceedings as leverage on businesses — to pressure them into paying the assessments or to “improve the statistics” of tax and law-enforcement agencies on filling in the budget. Law enforcement officers often suggest that taxpayers pay the amounts (even disputed or non-existent ones) “before charges are filed” to benefit from Part 4 of Article 212 of the Criminal Code and avoid criminal liability.

It is therefore important to carefully assess whether to pay disputed amounts, and if yes — how and when — to avoid criminal liability, or to pursue the matter through tax disputes — while fully considering the associated risks.

The full version of the article is available in Ukrainian by the link.

Kind regards,

© WTS Consulting LLC, 2025

Views 764

SIMILAR POSTS

Alexander Minin and Ivan Shynkarenko spoke at the АНК Ukraine event “Tax audits of businesses: How to prepare and what to expect” 12 June, 2025    496

Statute of limitations: Restrictions for tax audits, application of sanctions, tax documents retention, and the impact of COVID/martial law 12 June, 2025    1167

Tax audits: Types, criteria, and grounds for initiation 12 June, 2025    688

How long should we keep key documents for tax purposes?
A de facto limitation of tax audits for a “special period” in view of the absence of an obligation to keep documents for such “extended periods”
10 March, 2025    1902

Renewal of tax audits: what shall be considered before deciding on allowing the tax authority to conduct the tax audit and during the tax audit? 08 October, 2024    940

Proving the status of a non-resident as a beneficial owner of income: what circumstances did the Supreme Court pay attention to 05 August, 2024    1417

Alexander Minin and Ivan Shynkarenko participated in the round table discussion “Tax and Customs Audits – Practice and Innovations” at AНK Ukraine 23 July, 2024    2038

The Law on the “white business club” (which is not primarily about “white” business) regarding the level of tax payment above the industry average – for the future, and as an implicit confirmation of the illegality of this in the past 02 July, 2024    1535

Documentary customs audits are back: the Law has been promulgated 15 May, 2024    1692

Is it impossible to challenge the tax audit orders even if they are issued in the absence of legal grounds? Should the taxpayer bite the bullet and tolerate the tax audit? 09 April, 2024    3036

Scheduled documentary tax audit in 2024 appointed with the reference to low (compared to industry average) level of tax payment is illegal! 02 April, 2024    1613

Yuliia Kryvomaz spoke at the online event of the Ukrainian Bar Association dedicated to recent court practice in tax dispute resolution 12 February, 2024    945

Comment