{"id":707,"date":"2013-01-14T07:42:18","date_gmt":"2013-01-14T05:42:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kmp.ua\/?p=707"},"modified":"2018-02-19T14:42:59","modified_gmt":"2018-02-19T12:42:59","slug":"zvitnist-ppr-b2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kmp.ua\/en\/analytics\/exclusive\/zvitnist-ppr-b2\/","title":{"rendered":"How to reflect the tax notification-decision \u201cV2\u201d in the tax return and not to lose the right on VAT budget refund when 1095 days term has expired"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">According to provisions of Article 200 of the Tax Code, the right to obtain VAT budget refund is implemented through respective completion of tax return. Refund in the monetary form (an application should be filed additionally) or for offsetting tax liabilities of future periods \u2013 the taxpayer should report it in the tax return in respective lines 23.1 or 23.2.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"display: none;\">c941<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">After the amount of negative VAT was reported in line 23 of the VAT return, it \u201cdisappears\u201d from the tax return and does not participate in VAT budget refund calculation since that. Such amount is transferred from the tax return of the taxpayer to the personal account card.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">As a matter of fact a personal account card is an internal database of tax bodies which is kept regarding every taxpayer and assigned also for reflecting the state of his settlements with the budget regarding each type of taxes. Representatives of tax bodies made accent on exceptionally internal character of this data repeatedly in our practice. The taxpayer has no influence or opportunity to control it; there is only an opportunity to make verifications with tax authorities, which is also often complicated in practice.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The personal account card is a territory of tax bodies, and it is better not to rely on their consciousness and accuracy. A taxpayer can get into a situation when the amount of budget refund would be absent in personal account card upon results of verification with the tax service. However even its presence does not guarantee anything.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For example, during the last few years the disputes were frequent, which concerned the reimbursement of VAT overpayment or VAT budget refund after 3 years (1095 days) from the moment the respective right has appeared. The position of tax bodies during the long lasting period was the same \u2013 since according to the provisions of the Tax Code the application for VAT budget refund can be filed during 1095 days from the day on which such right has appeared, the right for such refund is lost if this period has expired. And first of all this concerns obtaining VAT budget refund for offsetting tax liabilities of future periods. Thus, the tax bodies repeatedly wrote off such claimed amount of VAT budget refund from a card stating, for example, the lack of application for its refund (which is not even foreseen by the legislation in this situation).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">If such dispute arises even the presence of the amount of budget refund on the personal account card will not help the taxpayer to prove his right for such refund. Primary evidence in such dispute would be only the submitted VAT return with the respective amount of VAT budget refund stated in it.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">However, how to defend the own right if a disputable amount of VAT budget refund was not stated by the taxpayer as such in the tax return?<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Obtainment and further reflection of tax notification-decision in form \u201cV2\u201d in the tax return is the striking example of such situation.<\/p>\n<p>According to para. 200.14 of the Tax Code and to Procedure of sending of tax notifications-decisions<sup><a title=\"\" href=\"file:\/\/\/C:\/Users\/Kolesnyk\/AppData\/Local\/Microsoft\/Windows\/Temporary%20Internet%20Files\/Content.Outlook\/VDOH3K1H\/%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%82%D1%8F_eng.doc#_ftn1\" name=\"_ftnref1\">1<\/a><\/sup>\u00a0the decisions in form \u201cV2\u201d are sent to a taxpayer upon detection of an understatement of VAT budget refund by a tax body. Considering this according to para. 200.14 of the Tax Code <span style=\"font-family: 'courier new', courier;\">&#8220;it is considered that a taxpayer voluntarily refuses to obtain such amount of understatement as VAT budget refund and accounts it according to para. 200.6 of this article for offsetting the tax liabilities of next tax periods&#8221;<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">To date an established position of tax bodies exists regarding reflection of such tax notification-decision in tax return, which is proved on practice. Such position is not confirmed by any official explanation of the Ministry of Revenues and Duties of Ukraine or its \u201cpredecessors\u201d.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Thus, according to the answer in the Unified Database of Tax Knowledge of 11.06.2012 (was in force until 05.02.2012, but in practice is also relevant now) one can track a following chain of considerations of tax bodies:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">if the VAT budget refund is understated according to para. 200.14 of the Tax Code it is assumed that the taxpayer refuses from obtaining this amount as VAT budget refund;<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">thus the amount of understatement cannot be recorded neither in line 23.1 nor in line 23.2 of the tax return (the lines in which the budget refund is recorded);<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">the understatement of amount of VAT budget refund means the overstatement of amount of negative VAT in line 24;<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">increase or reduction of amount of negative VAT in line 24 shall be recorded in line 21.3 (subpara. 4.6.7\u00a0 of the Procedure of completion of VAT\u00a0 return No. 1492).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">As a conclusion, the tax bodies establish the following procedure of actions of the taxpayer after obtaining the tax notification-decision in form \u201cV2\u201d: record the amount of understatement of VAT budget refund in line 21.3 of the tax return with the \u201cminus\u201d for the period, when such tax notification-decision was obtained. At the same time, as the tax service assures, such amount is automatically transferred to personal account card of a taxpayer and is used in the future periods for offsetting the VAT liabilities.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">However, the closer look on such procedure leads to some questions. Thus, by completion of line 21.3 with \u201cminus\u201d the respective amount disappears from the tax return. And such disappearance is not followed by any indication of the fact, that it should further be used for offsetting the tax liabilities \u2013 there is only the reduction of negative VAT amount as the result of tax audit.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">At the same time unlike, for example, tax notifications-decisions in forms \u201cV1\u201d or \u201cV3\u201d, the form \u201cV2\u201d of decision does not indicate that the amount, defined in it, is transferred to the personal account card of a taxpayer. There is no such indication in any legislative act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Obviously, the position of tax body is based on the Procedure of sending of tax notifications-decisions No. 253 and on the Procedure of completion of VAT tax return No. 166. However these legal acts have expired and effective acts do not contain similar provisions.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Alongside with that according to our practice in the similar disputes the tax service in fact does not perform any \u201cautomatic transaction\u201d of the amount from the TND V2 to the card.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In case of following the action plan, offered by the tax service the described situation can lead to the loss of VAT budget refund when three years term from the moment of its display in line 21.3 of the tax return has expired. The respective amount is displayed not as VAT budget refund, but as reduction of negative VAT, and such order of its display is not based on the legislation. In such conditions it is problematic to prove in the court that this amount really exists and really is a VAT budget refund.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For avoidance of such risk in case of obtaining of tax notification-decision in form \u201cV2\u201d it is advisable to use another procedure of reflect it in tax report. This procedure is strictly stipulated by the effective legislation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Thus, argumentation of tax service misses one important moment, namely the direct reference in para. 200.14 of the Tax Code to para. 200.6 of the Tax Code.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">According to para. 200.6 of the Tax Code the decision to use VAT budget refund for offsetting the tax liabilities &#8220;<span style=\"font-family: 'courier new', courier, monospace;\">is reflected by a taxpayer in the tax return, submitted upon results of reporting (tax) period, in which the right for submitting the application on obtaining VAT budget refund arises according to provisions of this article. If such decision is made the indicated amount is not taken into account while calculating the amount of VAT budget refund of following reporting (tax) periods&#8221;.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Thus, para. 200.14 combined with para. 200.6 of the Tax Code provide the plain procedure of actions of the taxpayer who obtained the tax notification-decision in \u201cV2\u201d form, namely:\u00a0<em>to reflect the indicated amount in the tax return for the period, in which such tax notification-decision was obtained<\/em>. According to subpara. 4.6.5 of the Procedure of completion of VAT return No. 1492 the decision to offset the future tax liabilities with the amounts of VAT budget refund should be reflected in line 23.2 of the tax return, which even has the respective title.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Such reflection of the TND \u201cV2\u201d not only fully suits the provisions of the legislation, but also allows recording accurately the amount of reduction of VAT budget refund in tax return.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">However after choosing such approach on practice we faced the reduction of VAT budget refund with application of penalties by tax bodies according to article 123.1 of the Tax Code. Since according to the position of tax service the amount from TND \u201cV2\u201d is automatically transferred to the personal account card, its reflection in line 23.2 of the tax return by a taxpayer leads to artificial redoubling of this amount in the card. The given scenario is fulfilled even when no automatic transfer of amount in TND \u201cV2\u201d to the card was done by the tax bodies.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Taking into account this practical situation few plans of action should be considered:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">to perform verification with the tax body to find out whether the respective amount of reduction of VAT budget refund was transferred to personal account card;<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">if amount is transferred to the card, it is better to record the amount of TND \u201cV2\u201d through reduction of index in the line 24 of respective period without changing any indexes in other lines. If the amount is not transferred to the card, it is reasonable to file the claim to the court with demand to oblige the tax body to make respective amendments in the personal account card;<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">if the refund is performed during three years, a situation is settled. Otherwise the risk to lose the right for such refund as described above appears again, since the respective amount was not recorded in the tax return. In this case it is advisable to provide the adjusting calculation for the period, in which TND \u201cV2\u201d was obtained and record the respective amount in line 23.2 as budget refund. Alongside with such calculation we recommend to provide an explanatory note. In this note the reasons for adjustment should be stated with the reference to the provisions of legislation mentioned in this article, and should be requested not to double transfer it to the personal account card.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em><strong>The above commentary presents the general statement for information purposes only and as such may not be practically used in specific cases without professional advice.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Footnotes:\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n<div>\n<div class=\"_mce_tagged_br\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em><sup><a title=\"\" href=\"file:\/\/\/C:\/Users\/Kolesnyk\/AppData\/Local\/Microsoft\/Windows\/Temporary%20Internet%20Files\/Content.Outlook\/VDOH3K1H\/%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%82%D1%8F_eng.doc#_ftnref1\" name=\"_ftn1\">1<\/a><\/sup>\u00a0See the Order of the Ministry of finance of28.11.2012 \u2116 1236.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: right;\"><span style=\"color: #808080;\"><em>January 14, 2014<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">According to provisions of Article 200 of the Tax Code, the right to obtain VAT budget refund is implemented through respective completion of tax return. Refund in the monetary form (an application should be filed additionally) or for offsetting tax liabilities of future periods \u2013 the taxpayer should report it in the tax return in respective lines 23.1 or 23.2.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"display: none;\">c941<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">After the amount of negative VAT was reported in line 23 of the VAT return, it \u201cdisappears\u201d from the tax return and does not participate in VAT budget refund calculation since that. Such amount is transferred from the tax return of the taxpayer to the personal account card.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">As a matter of fact a personal account card is an internal database of tax bodies which is kept regarding every taxpayer and assigned also for reflecting the state of his settlements with the budget regarding each type of taxes. Representatives of tax bodies made accent on exceptionally internal character of this data repeatedly in our practice. The taxpayer has no influence or opportunity to control it; there is only an opportunity to make verifications with tax authorities, which is also often complicated in practice.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The personal account card is a territory of tax bodies, and it is better not to rely on their consciousness and accuracy. A taxpayer can get into a situation when the amount of budget refund would be absent in personal account card upon results of verification with the tax service. However even its presence does not guarantee anything.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For example, during the last few years the disputes were frequent, which concerned the reimbursement of VAT overpayment or VAT budget refund after 3 years (1095 days) from the moment the respective right has appeared. The position of tax bodies during the long lasting period was the same \u2013 since according to the provisions of the Tax Code the application for VAT budget refund can be filed during 1095 days from the day on which such right has appeared, the right for such refund is lost if this period has expired. And first of all this concerns obtaining VAT budget refund for offsetting tax liabilities of future periods. Thus, the tax bodies repeatedly wrote off such claimed amount of VAT budget refund from a card stating, for example, the lack of application for its refund (which is not even foreseen by the legislation in this situation).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">If such dispute arises even the presence of the amount of budget refund on the personal account card will not help the taxpayer to prove his right for such refund. Primary evidence in such dispute would be only the submitted VAT return with the respective amount of VAT budget refund stated in it.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">However, how to defend the own right if a disputable amount of VAT budget refund was not stated by the taxpayer as such in the tax return?<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Obtainment and further reflection of tax notification-decision in form \u201cV2\u201d in the tax return is the striking example of such situation.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[78],"class_list":["post-707","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-exclusive","tag-tax-other"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kmp.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/707"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kmp.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kmp.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kmp.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kmp.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=707"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/kmp.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/707\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8997,"href":"https:\/\/kmp.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/707\/revisions\/8997"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kmp.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=707"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kmp.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=707"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kmp.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=707"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}