{"id":692,"date":"2013-12-26T14:47:15","date_gmt":"2013-12-26T12:47:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kmp.ua\/?p=692"},"modified":"2021-02-22T18:35:08","modified_gmt":"2021-02-22T16:35:08","slug":"pravova-pryroda-sudovogo-zboru","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kmp.ua\/en\/analytics\/exclusive\/pravova-pryroda-sudovogo-zboru\/","title":{"rendered":"Reimbursement of expenses as method of struggle against tax lawlessness: Part III"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>\u00a0The legal nature of\u00a0 the court fee and adequacy of its normative regulation<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right;\"><span style=\"color: #b40637;\"><em><a href=\"https:\/\/kmp.ua\/en\/analytics\/exclusive\/sudzbir\/\"><span style=\"color: #b40637;\">Read other parts<\/span><\/a><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p><a style=\"line-height: 1.3em;\" href=\"\/ua\/index.php?option=com_content&#038;view=article&#038;id=810:pravova-pryroda-sudovogo-zboru&#038;catid=16:newsletters&#038;Itemid=7\" target=\"_self\"><br \/>\n<\/a>This article considers the issue of the legal nature of the court fee, its place in the tax system and mandatory fees, as well as compliance of the regulation of the court fee with its essence.\u00a0The issue in question is about the court fee, which is paid when applying to the court and some further steps in development of the court case.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Rising expenses on the court fee<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Due to adoption of the Law of Ukraine &#8220;On the Court Fee&#8221; the rates of the court fee have been significantly increased. Especially, this &#8220;affected&#8221; the participants of administrative proceedings, which litigate with the tax authorities<sup>1<\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p>In particular, the maximum amount to be paid in case of submission of a claim against the tax authorities increased <strong>by 5.7 times <span style=\"font-size: 12.1599998474121px; line-height: 15.8079996109009px; text-align: justify;\">\u2013<\/span>\u00a0from UAH\u00a0406 to UAH\u00a02294 within the period from November 1, 2011 to October 23, 2013<\/strong>. And this amount will increase further, at least, due to increase of the minimum wage over the years which is connected with the calculation of the maximum amount of the court fee.<\/p>\n<p>Previously, when filing a claim two components of the amount, which by itself was smaller, were paid: the state duty constituted 2\/5 (the maximum amount of claims of material nature \u2013 UAH\u00a0170), and 3\/5 of the amount\u00a0\u2013\u00a0the cost of information and technical support of litigation (in commercial cases \u2013\u00a0UAH\u00a0236).<br \/>\nIt is quite possible that the court fee will increase further and significantly even this year and not because of the increase of the minimum wage. Thus, the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine considers the draft law that envisages the double increase of the court fee compared with the existing amount.<\/p>\n<p>In particular, according to the draft law the size of the court fee by claims against the tax authorities shall be 2 percent of the amount of the proprietary claims, but not less than <strong>1.5 size and not more than 4 minimum wages<\/strong><sup>2<\/sup>. In the case of passing this draft law in the near future, the maximum amount of the court fee for applying to the court may reach UAH\u00a04588 this year.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, expenses on the court fee for applying to the court constantly increase.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Possible additional expenses due to vagueness of the order of the fee payment<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>At present the issue of the procedure of payment of the court fee and tailoring the appropriate payment document remains not regulated:<\/p>\n<p>Since July 7, 2012 the Order of the State Tax Inspection of Ukraine of April 22,1993, No.\u00a015 &#8220;On Approval of the Instruction on the Procedure of Calculation and Collection of the State Duty&#8221; (hereinafter \u2013 &#8220;Instruction No.15&#8221;), according to which payment of the court fee as a payment for filing complaints, appeal claims and claims of cassation, lost validity due to adoption of the Order of the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine No.\u00a0811 as of July 7, 2012 &#8220;On Approval of the Instruction on the Procedure of Calculation and Collection of the State Duty &#8220;(hereinafter referred to as the &#8220;Instruction No.\u00a0811&#8221;).<\/p>\n<p>In the new Instruction No. 811 nothing is mentioned about the court fee or fees for filing claims, appeal claims and claims of cassation. Therefore at the present time the only document which regulates the payment of is the Code of Administrative Proceedings of Ukraine and the Law of Ukraine &#8220;On the Court Fee&#8221;. However, the aforementioned regulations do not contain any requirements for documents on payment of court fee. In particular, >the requirement of <span class=\"hps\">affixing the marks of the bank on transfer of funds to the budget on the back of the payment order, which was previously set by Instruction No.\u00a015, is currently missing.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>However, in practice so far it is not clear, how the courts will respond to payment orders without respective marks of the bank. It is quite possible that proceeding from practice and by analogy, the courts will leave the claims (appeal claims and claims of cassation) without consideration.<\/p>\n<p>Receipt of such mark becomes fee-based. Thus, according to the verbal information, which was received in &#8220;Raiffeisen Bank Aval&#8221;, the bank may put such marks on the request of the clients ,but it is not free (charge for this &#8220;service&#8221; in &#8220;Raiffeisen Bank Aval&#8221; is UAH\u00a010).<\/p>\n<p>That is, even here the taxpayer must bear an additional expenses due to the lack of clear regulation of the issue of payment of the court fee and tailoring of the respective payment document so that the claim (appeal or claim of cassation) will not be left without consideration or as an option to try to prove, that such mark is not necessary.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Background: from the state duty to the court fee<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Before the Law of Ukraine &#8220;On the Court Fee&#8221; came into force (November 01, 2011), payment of the state duty and later the court fee, when applying to court, was obligatory but in the order and amounts, established by the laws for the state duty \u2013\u00a0some procedural codes of Ukraine still contain such transitional provisions.<\/p>\n<p>Thus, for instance, the Code of Administrative Proceedings (para.\u00a03 of part VII &#8220;The Final and Transitional Provisions&#8221;):<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;3. Before the law which regulates the procedure of payment of the court fee and its size becomes effective:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>When applying to the administrative court, the court fee shall be paid in the order established by the legislation for the state duty.<\/li>\n<li>The amount of the court fee is determined according to sub-para.\u00a0&#8220;b&#8221; of para.\u00a01 of Article 3 of the Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine &#8220;On the State Duty&#8221;<sup>3<\/sup>, except for the cases prescribed by sub-para.\u00a03 of this paragraph.<\/li>\n<li>The size of the court fee with respect to proprietary claims for the recovery of monetary funds is one percent of the amount of such claims, but not more than UAH\u00a01700&#8243;.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>That is, the court fee is the follower of the state duty, which was paid when applying to the court.<\/p>\n<p><strong>The legal nature of the court fee:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong><em> in contrast with the previously paid state duty, this is not a tax formally;<\/em><\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong><em> such reshuffle is one of the components of the changes in the number of taxes during the adoption of the Tax Code.<\/em><\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The state duty, <span class=\"hps\">which was previously paid when applying to the court, as a compulsory payment was a part of the taxation system (Article 14 of the Law &#8220;On System of Taxation&#8221;, which lost validity on January 1, 2011 due to the Tax Code coming into force).<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hps\">Therefore, the procedure of establishing and the mechanism of payment of the state duty were clearly regulated by laws as the other payments that composed the taxation system. <\/span><\/p>\n<p>But it was before the Tax Code of Ukraine.<\/p>\n<p>At present, neither the state duty, nor the court fee which has compulsory to be paid when applying to the court with the claim, appeal claim etc., are not included to the taxation system under the Tax Code. In particular, they are not listed <span class=\"hps\">in<\/span> <span class=\"hps\">the mandatory<\/span> <span class=\"hps\">taxes<\/span> <span class=\"hps\">and fees,<\/span> <span class=\"hps\">which<\/span> are prescribed <span class=\"hps\">in Article<\/span> <span class=\"hps\">9<\/span> of the <span class=\"hps\">Tax Code.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hps\">Previously (before the Tax Code), the state duty (the follower of which is the court fee) when applying to the court<\/span>, <span class=\"hps\">was the part of<\/span> <span class=\"hps\">the taxation system and<\/span> was <span class=\"hps\">recognized<\/span> as a <span class=\"hps\">tax (<\/span>obligatory <span class=\"hps\">duty).What has changed with the adoption of the Tax Code: to ensure that such payment is not tax it was enough to bring it out of the taxation system <span style=\"font-size: 12.1599998474121px; line-height: 15.8079996109009px; text-align: justify;\">\u2013<\/span>\u00a0not to call the tax (obligatory duty) in the Tax Code (and thus reduce the amount of taxes to be paid in Ukraine <span style=\"font-size: 12.1599998474121px; line-height: 15.8079996109009px; text-align: justify;\">\u2013<\/span>\u00a0to work on ratings)?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hps\">If take into consideration that:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hps\" style=\"font-family: 'courier new', courier; font-size: 12pt;\">&#8220;Establishing the state taxes and duties, which are not envisaged by this Tax Code is prohibited (para.\u00a09.4 of Article 9 of the Tax Code)&#8221;;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hps\" style=\"font-family: 'courier new', courier; font-size: 12pt;\"> &#8220;State and local taxes and fees, collection of which is not stipulated by this Code, shall not be paid (para.\u00a04.2 of Article 4 of the Tax Code)&#8221;;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hps\">it follows that this fee may not be paid though <em>it is in fact a tax? <\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hps\">In order to provide the answers it is necessary to find out what these payments are.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hps\"><strong>The state duty and the court fee as the state tax duties<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong>1.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hps\">According to para.6.2 of\u00a0 Article 6 of &#8220;Definition of\u00a0<\/span><span class=\"hps\">Tax and\u00a0<\/span><span class=\"hps\">Fee&#8221; of the Tax Code:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: 'courier new', courier; font-size: 12pt;\"><span class=\"hps\">&#8220;Fee (payment, contribution) is a compulsory payment to the respective budget, which is collected from payers of duties under condition <\/span>of acquiring a special <span class=\"hps\">benefit, including the legally significant actions provided by state bodies, <\/span>bodies of local self-governments, other authorized bodies and persons <span class=\"hps\">in favor of such persons&#8221;.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p>That is, the <em>tax<\/em> fee shall contain the following features:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>obligation of its payment;<\/li>\n<li>conditionality of the payment by receiving the special benefit, which also consists in execution of legal actions in favor of the taxpayer by the state authorities;<\/li>\n<li><span style=\"line-height: 1.3em;\">transfer of the tax to the appropriate budget.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>It appears that the court fee meets these criteria. So, one may not pay it, since it is not included into the list of taxes and duties under the Tax Code? \u00a0<span class=\"hps\"><br \/>\n<span class=\"hps\"><br \/>\n<\/span><\/span><strong>2.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hps\">However, everything is not quite so simple. Since it may be denied that legality of introduction of the mandatory<\/span> <span class=\"hps\">duties by<\/span> <span class=\"hps\">separate laws<\/span> <span class=\"hps\">(not by the Tax Code actually) is envisaged<\/span> <span class=\"hps\">as the<\/span> <span class=\"hps\">transition<\/span> <span class=\"hps\">procedure of <\/span>para<span class=\"hps\">. 2,<\/span> <span class=\"hps\">sub-section<\/span> <span class=\"hps\">10 of Section XX<\/span> <span class=\"hps\">&#8220;Transitional provisions&#8221; <\/span>of the <span class=\"hps\">Tax Code, according to which:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hps\" style=\"font-family: 'courier new', courier;\">&#8220;<strong>Fees (payment, contributions)<\/strong>, <strong>which are not established by this Code as national<\/strong> or local, but prescribed by the legislative acts of Ukraine as mandatory payments prior to this Code coming into force, are collected under the rules established by these legislative acts of Ukraine <strong>before the Law on Administrative Services and other laws, that will regulate collection of respective fees (payment, contributions), come into force.&#8221;<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hps\">The Law of Ukraine &#8220;On Administrative Services&#8221; has <\/span>already come into force. But the effect of the aforesaid transitional rule has actually been extended: according to para. 5 of Article 20 <span class=\"hps\">&#8220;<\/span>Final and Transitional Provisions<span class=\"hps\">&#8220;<\/span> of the Law of Ukraine <span class=\"hps\">&#8220;<\/span>On Administrative Services<span class=\"hps\">&#8220;<\/span>, which came into force on November 07, 2012 the aforesaid provisions will expire only from January 01, 2014. By that time the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine shall file <span class=\"hps\">the draft law \u201c<em>on inclusion of the provisions with regard to the state duty, other mandatory payments to the Tax Code of Ukraine<\/em>&#8221; <\/span>as well for consideration to the <span class=\"hps\">Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine<\/span> (sub-para.\u00a0<span class=\"hps\">&#8220;<\/span>d<span class=\"hps\">&#8220;<\/span> of para.\u00a06 of Article 20 <span class=\"hps\">&#8220;Final and Transitional Provisions&#8221; of the Law of Ukraine &#8220;On Administrative Services&#8221;).<\/span><\/p>\n<p>We note that such draft law was published for discussion on the website of the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine on January 18, 2013. This draft law envisages, <em>inter alia<\/em>, inclusion of the state duty to the state tax and duties and, therefore, addition of new sub-para.\u00a09.1.19 to para.\u00a09.1 of Article 9 of Tax Code.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-align: justify;\">In other words, the legislator by this acknowledged that (1) had done a\u00a0<\/span><span class=\"hps\" style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;<\/span><span style=\"text-align: justify;\">mistake<\/span><span class=\"hps\" style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;<\/span><span style=\"text-align: justify;\">, envisaging the possibility to set mandatory payments by separate laws, and that (2) the state duty and other mandatory payments shall be included to the taxation system that requires amendments to the Tax Code.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a03. <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>However, this step does not mean the court fee.<\/p>\n<p>Actually, the present court fee consists of the former state duty and expenses on informational and technical support of the court proceedings, so now it is <span class=\"hps\">&#8220;<\/span>two in one<span class=\"hps\">&#8220;<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>Pursuant to Article 1 of the Law of Ukraine <span class=\"hps\">&#8220;<\/span>On the Court Fee<span class=\"hps\">&#8220;:<\/span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">\u00a0&#8220;<span style=\"font-family: 'Courier New';\">the court fee \u2013 is a fee, which is collected on the whole territory of Ukraine for submission of the applications, appeal claims to the court as well as for issuing the documents by the courts and included to the court expenses\u201d<\/span>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>According<span style=\"color: #222222;\"> to the provisions of the <\/span><span class=\"hps\">procedural<\/span> <span class=\"hps\">codes <\/span><span style=\"color: #222222;\">of Ukraine, nonpayment of the court fee is a ground for the refusal to accept claims, appeal claims, etc. This means that in case of its nonpayment, the citizens and enterprises are deprived of the right to judicial protection of their interests. In other words, there are all reasons to assert that the court fee is paid for the court proceedings by the claims of citizens and taxpayers, and that the purpose of the court fee is providing of court financing. <\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #222222;\">\u00a0<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #222222;\">The court fee is paid to the special fund of the State Budget, the main manager of which, according to Article 142 of the Law <\/span><span class=\"hps\">&#8220;<\/span><span style=\"color: #222222;\">On <\/span>Judicial System and Judges&#8217; Status<span class=\"hps\">&#8220;<\/span>, is the State Court Administration on <strong>financial support\u00a0<\/strong>of the activity of all courts of general jurisdiction.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, the court fee is obligatory for paying when <span style=\"color: #222222;\">applying<\/span> to the court and submitting the appeal claims, etc. (i.e. related to making specific actions by the state authority \u2013 by the court \u2013 for the benefit of the taxpayer), it is paid to the State Budget and therefore conforms to criteria of tax fee according to the Tax Code.<\/p>\n<p>So, why is the court fee not mentioned in the Tax Code yet?<\/p>\n<p>Removing it from the tax system and fixing it by the special Law of Ukraine <span class=\"hps\">&#8220;<\/span>On the Court Fee<span class=\"hps\">&#8220;<\/span> makes precondition for replacing of financing of courts on the citizens and taxpayers, which is a gross violation of the provisions of the Constitution of Ukraine and the Law of Ukraine <span class=\"hps\">&#8220;<\/span><span style=\"color: #222222;\">On <\/span>Judicial System and Judges&#8217; Status<span class=\"hps\">&#8220;<\/span>, as well as undermines the principles of legal proceedings in Ukraine by limiting the rights of citizens and taxpayers to defend their interests in the courts.<\/p>\n<p>The possibility of increasing \u201cthe court fee\u201d may be endless, and since it is not the tax or duty within the system of taxation, it may be done by the simplified procedure, when the need to fill <span class=\"hps\">&#8220;<\/span>the holes<span class=\"hps\">&#8220;<\/span> in the State Budget arises. Why then it was to envisage the expenses of the State Budget for financial support of the courts, if it may be put into the shoulders of that persons, who will apply to the court for the protection of the violated rights, protected interests.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Court fee as a source of financial support of courts <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>With adoption of the Law <span class=\"hps\">&#8220;<\/span>On the Court Fee<span class=\"hps\">&#8220;<\/span> the rates of the court fee have been considerably increased in comparison with court expenses, which the person who appealed to the court experienced.<span class=\"hps\"><br \/>\n<\/span><span class=\"hps\"><br \/>\nBut the courts are still lack of money. According to the information of the State Judicial Administration of Ukraine, current expenses of the courts of general jurisdiction (without taking into consideration the remuneration of labour and public utilities) are financed by only 9,1% of the required <sup>4<\/sup>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>And it is the money that is not enough <span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: 'Courier New';\">\u201c<span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">for strengthening of the material and technical base of the courts, including establishment and provision of operating <\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"><span style=\"font-family: 'Courier New';\">the Unified Judicial Informational System, web portal of the <\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'Courier New';\">judicial authority, computer local networks, modern systems of fixation of the court proceedings, purchase and servicing of computing machinery and reproducing equipment, implementation of electronic digital signature\u201d<\/span>.<\/span> So, the money for informational and technical support of the court proceedings in the context of legislation which was valid before the Law of Ukraine <span class=\"hps\">&#8220;<\/span>On the Court Fee<span class=\"hps\">&#8220;<\/span> came into force.<\/p>\n<p>What does the Government do? Instead of <span class=\"hps\">&#8220;<\/span>seeking<span class=\"hps\">&#8221;\u00a0<\/span>for money in the State Budget, as it is required by the current legislation, the Government prepares and submits the new draft Law of Ukraine <span class=\"hps\">&#8220;<\/span>On Amendments to Some Legislative Acts of Ukraine (re. payment of the court fee<span class=\"hps\">&#8220;<\/span> (draft law No.\u00a011183 of 06.09.2012) to the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine.<\/p>\n<p>Moreover, in financial and economic motivation of the expediency of its adoption is mentioned that <span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"><span style=\"font-family: 'Courier New';\">\u201cAdoption of this Law <strong>does not require increasing of the budget expenses<\/strong>. Instead, the total amount of <strong>additional revenue<\/strong> to the State Budget of Ukraine as a result of respective changes during 7 months in the current year will be <strong style=\"font-size: 12.1599998474121px; line-height: 15.8079996109009px; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: 'Courier New';\">UAH\u00a0<\/span><\/strong><\/span><strong><span style=\"font-family: 'Courier New';\">110\u00a0<\/span><\/strong><strong><span style=\"font-family: 'Courier New';\">mln<\/span><\/strong><span style=\"font-family: 'Courier New';\">.\u201d <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p>Herewith, practically courts financing is shifted from the State Budget to the claimants, including the taxpayers in the disputes against the tax authorities.<\/p>\n<p>This contradicts the <span style=\"color: #222222;\">provisions of the Constitution of <\/span>Ukraine<span style=\"color: #222222;\"> and the Law of Ukraine <\/span><span class=\"hps\">&#8220;<\/span><span style=\"color: #222222;\">On <\/span>Judicial System and Judges&#8217; Status<span class=\"hps\">&#8220;.<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #222222;\">\u00a0<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #222222;\">Article 140 of the Law of Ukraine <\/span><span class=\"hps\">&#8220;<\/span><span style=\"color: #222222;\">On <\/span>Judicial System and Judges&#8217; Status<span class=\"hps\">&#8221; establishes<\/span><span style=\"color: #222222;\"> that:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Courier New';\">&#8220;1. Financing and proper conditions for functioning of the courts and judges <strong>are ensured by the state<\/strong> according to the Constitution of Ukraine.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Courier New';\">2. Provision of functioning of the judicial authority envisages the following:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"><span style=\"font-family: 'Courier New';\">1) determining <strong>the <\/strong><\/span><strong><span style=\"font-family: 'Courier New';\">expenditures<\/span><\/strong><span style=\"font-family: 'Courier New';\"> <strong>in the State Budget of Ukraine on financing the courts <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">not less than the level<\/span><\/strong> which ensures the possibility of full and independent effectuation of justice according to the law&#8221;.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"><span style=\"color: #222222;\">Pursuant<\/span> to Article\u00a0142 of the specified Law <span style=\"font-family: 'Courier New';\">\u201c1. Funding of all courts of Ukraine is made at the expense of the State Budget of Ukraine\u201d.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">In accordance with part 1 of Article 130 of the Constitution of Ukraine: <span style=\"font-family: 'Courier New';\">\u201c<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'Courier New';\">The State shall ensure financing and proper conditions for functioning of courts and the activity of judges. Expenditures for the maintenance of the courts shall be allocated separately in the State Budget of Ukraine&#8221;.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p>This provision of the first part of Article 130 has an official interpretation according to the Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine dated 11.03.2010 N 7-\u0440\u043f\/2010, which includes:<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"><span style=\"font-family: 'Courier New';\">\u201c1. In the aspect of constitutional petitions the provisions of part 1 of Article 130 of the Constitution of Ukraine, namely \u201c<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'Courier New';\">The State shall ensure financing and proper conditions for functioning of courts and the activity of judges\u201d, shall be understood in such a way:<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'courier new', courier, monospace;\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">financing of <\/span><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">all courts in Ukraine <\/span><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">has to be provided by the state <\/span><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">exceptionally <\/span><\/strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">at the expense of the State Budget of Ukraine;<\/span><\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: 'courier new', courier, monospace;\">on behalf of the state, the ensuring of financing of courts shall be made by the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine through elaboration and submission of the draft Law on the State budget of Ukraine to the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine and by the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine through approval of the State Budget of Ukraine exceptionally by the Law of Ukraine, control of its execution and taking a decision on the report of its execution;<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: 'courier new', courier, monospace;\">expenditures for the maintenance of the courts shall be allocated separately in the State Budget of Ukraine not less than the level that could provide the possibility for independent effectuation of justice with the further ensuring of full and timely allotment of such expenditures;<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: 'courier new', courier, monospace;\">executive authorities shall take part in organizational provision of functioning of courts and activity of judges in cases and in the order envisaged by the Constitution of Ukraine and the laws of Ukraine.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"><span style=\"font-family: 'Courier New';\">2. <\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'Courier New';\">In the aspect of constitutional petitions the provisions of part 1 of Article 130 of the Constitution of Ukraine, namely: \u201c<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'Courier New';\">Expenditures for maintenance of courts shall be allocated separately in the State Budget of Ukraine\u201d, shall be understood in a way that the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine is obliged to envisage the expenditures for each court of different jurisdictions and levels by the separate\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 lines <span class=\"hps\"><span style=\"color: #333333;\">in sufficient<\/span><\/span><span style=\"color: #333333;\"> <span class=\"hps\">amount for<\/span> <span class=\"hps\">the administration of justice in the draft Law on the State Budget of Ukraine, and the <\/span><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'Courier New';\">Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine <\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'Courier New';\">shall determine such <\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'Courier New';\">expenditures in the State Budget of Ukraine&#8221;.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p>To sum up the above, current legislation clearly establishes that the courts shall be financed exceptionally by the State Budget of Ukraine but not by the costs of the participants of the proceedings, in particular by the cost of the taxpayers in the disputes against the tax authorities.<\/p>\n<p>From this point of view the substantiation of the draft law looks very interesting, as its adoption will not lead to increase of expenditures of the State Budget since according to the Constitution of Ukraine the respective expenditures shall be financed by the by the State Budget of Ukraine.<\/p>\n<p>As regards the contradiction of the said draft law to the provisions of the current legislation, the Conclusion of the Chief Scientific and Expert Administration of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, states that:<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Courier New';\">\u201c1. The main idea of the draft law is to raise the level of funding current expenditures of general jurisdiction courts by means of increase of the amount of the court fees from the participants in a trail, widening of the circle of the court fees payers, etc.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Courier New';\"><\u2026><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"><span style=\"font-family: 'Courier New';\">According to the Chief Administration the <strong>selective exemption of the state authorities<\/strong> from payment of the court fee does not completely comply with para.\u00a02 of Part 3 of Article 129 of the Constitution of Ukraine which stipulates that <strong>the fundamental principles<\/strong> of Ukrainian legislation is \u201c<strong>equality <\/strong><strong>of all participants in a trial before the law<\/strong> <strong>and the court\u201d<\/strong>, that is fixed in the Law of Ukraine \u201cOn Judicial System\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'Courier New';\">and Judges\u2019 Status\u201d as well as in the Code of Administrative Court Procedure of Ukraine (Article 7), the Code of Civil Procedure and the Code of Commercial Procedure of Ukraine (Article 42<sup>2<\/sup>). Therefore, currently <strong>the exemption of the state authorities<\/strong> from payment of the court fee shall be considered as <strong>giving them procedural preferences to other participants in a trial<\/strong>-legal entities and natural persons which are obliged to pay the respective fee, and practically this <strong>will narrow their rights to apply to the court<\/strong>.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Courier New';\">Therefore, the issue regarding increase of financing the courts at the costs of the court fee would be reasonable to decide by ordering the provisions which provide the privilege on its payment by the proper state authority instead of increase the rate of this fee.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The issue of violation of the basic principles of financing the courts by the legislative and executive authorities was raised on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scourt.gov.ua\/clients\/vs.nsf\/0\/047A13E2322E970EC2257A950040E7D1?opendocument\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" class=\"broken_link\"><span style=\"color: #b40637;\"><span style=\"color: #b40637;\">the Plenary Session of the Supreme Court of Ukraine<\/span><\/span><\/a> which took place on November 12, 2012. At this session the decision to appeal to the Constitutional Court of Ukraine with the constitutional petition as to official interpretation of the first and the second parts of Article 9 of the Law of Ukraine <span class=\"hps\">&#8220;<\/span>On the Court Fee<span class=\"hps\">&#8220;<\/span> was made. The aforementioned constitutional petition of the Supreme Court of Ukraine as of January 14, 2013 <span style=\"color: #b40637;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ccu.gov.ua\/uk\/publish\/article\/193525\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"color: #b40637;\">is on the stage of studying by the panel of judges of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine<\/span><\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>According to the press service of the Supreme Court of Ukraine, the constitutional petition emphasizes, <em>inter alia<\/em>, that in fact financing of courts, including remuneration of judges, is carried out by means of the court fee, which is contrary to the legislation in force:<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"><span style=\"font-family: 'Courier New';\">&#8220;<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'Courier New';\">Thus, the Letter of the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine No.31-07220-2-4\/1735 dated March 21, 2012, which was addressed to the Committee of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on the Issues of the Budget and to the State Court Administration of Ukraine in the part regarding the court fee costs directed at realization of justice, <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">stipulates that<\/span> <strong>the expenditures<\/strong> on justice realization <strong>include<\/strong> not only expenses directly related to consideration of the cases (paper, postage fees, fixing of the court trial) but also <strong>the remuneration of labour of judges for direct realization of justice by them.<\/strong><\/span><\/span><br \/>\n<span class=\"hps\" style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"> <span style=\"font-family: 'Courier New'; color: #333333;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Courier New';\"> However, according to the Supreme Court of Ukraine, such approach of the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine is mistaken since it contradicts to the provisions of the Main Law of Ukraine and does not correspond to the respective decisions of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"><span style=\"font-family: 'Courier New';\">As it was mentioned on the Plenary Session, the courts as the body of state authority <\/span><em><span style=\"font-family: 'Courier New'; color: #333333;\">a priori<\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-family: 'Courier New'; color: #333333;\"> <span class=\"hps\">may not<\/span> <span class=\"hps\">be subjects of<\/span> <span class=\"hps\">income<\/span> <span class=\"hps\">and do not have<\/span> <span class=\"hps\">any other<\/span> <span class=\"hps\">sources of<\/span> <span class=\"hps\">funds<\/span> <span class=\"hps\">other than<\/span> <span class=\"hps\">the State<\/span> <span class=\"hps\">Budget of Ukraine<\/span> <span class=\"hps\">since<\/span> they <span class=\"hps\">operate<\/span> <span class=\"hps\"><strong>exceptionally <\/strong>by means of<\/span> <span class=\"hps\">government funding<\/span> <span class=\"hps\"><strong>within limits<\/strong><\/span><strong> <span class=\"hps\">provided by law<\/span> <span class=\"hps\">on the State Budget<\/span> <span class=\"hps\">of Ukraine for the<\/span> respective <span class=\"hps\">year.<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Courier New';\"><\u2026><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"><span style=\"font-family: 'Courier New';\">The constitutional petition emphasizes that violation of the basic principles of funding of the courts by the legislative and executive authorities may cause negative public response. A stable <\/span><span class=\"hps\"><span style=\"font-family: 'Courier New'; color: #333333;\">social<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'Courier New'; color: #333333;\"> <span class=\"hps\">illusion is formed on the issue, that the implementation of power by judges is aimed at obtaining of respective incomes by means of the court fee from its payers and that the judges have a corporate interest in increasing the rates of the mentioned obligatory payment.\u201d<sup>5<\/sup><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p>But in fact it is not <span class=\"hps\">&#8220;<\/span>an illusion<span class=\"hps\">&#8220;<\/span> anymore, the draft law <span class=\"hps\">&#8220;<\/span>On Amendments to Some Legislative Acts of Ukraine (regarding payment of the court fee)<span class=\"hps\">&#8220;<\/span> No.\u00a011183 dated September 06, 2012 \u2013 is a vivid conformation of this.<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>The above commentary presents the general statement for information purposes only and as such may not be practically used in specific cases without professional advice.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Footnotes:<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em><sup>1<\/sup>At\u00a0the\u00a0beginning\u00a0of 2012 the\u00a0Supreme Administrative Court issued\u00a0the\u00a0explanation (the\u00a0Letter\u00a0No.\u00a0165\/11\/13-12 as of January 18,2012) according\u00a0to\u00a0which the claims on cancellation of the tax notification-assessments are referred\u00a0to\u00a0administrative\u00a0claims of material nature.Accordingly, applying to the court the taxpayer shall pay 1% of the size of the proprietary claims, but not more than 2 minimum wages, established as of January 1 of the current year (UAH\u00a02294 in 2013).<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em><sup>2<\/sup>At the present time the court fee constitutes 1\u00a0% of the size of the proprietary claims but not less than 0,1 size and not more than 2 sizes of the minimum wages.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em><sup>3<\/sup>Hereinafter \u2013 \u201cthe Decree&#8221;.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em><sup>4<\/sup>The article &#8220;A costly luxury\u201d, the edition \u201cDelovaia Stolitsa\u201d No\u00a041\/595 dated 08.10.2012.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em><sup>5<\/sup><a href=\"http:\/\/zakon3.rada.gov.ua\/laws\/show\/v008u710-13\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"color: #b40637;\"><span style=\"color: #b40637;\">Court Determination of the Panel of Judges of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine <\/span><\/span><\/a>No. 8-u\/2013 dated February 27, 2013 in the case No.\u00a02-9\/2013 denied in opening constitutional proceeding, since justification and analysis of provisions of the Law, which was provided in constitutional petition and which the author of the petition asked to interpret, give grounds for a conclusion about legislative irregularity of the questions raised in the constitutional petition. Pursuant to the legal position of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine, which was stated in a Determination No. 9-u\/2002 dated March 21, 2002, the absence of the legislative regulation cannot be a ground for a consideration of the constitutional petition since this is an exclusive right of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u00a0The legal nature of\u00a0 the court fee and adequacy of its normative regulation Read other parts This article considers the issue of the legal nature of the court fee, its place in the tax system and mandatory fees, as well as compliance of the regulation of the court fee with its essence.\u00a0The issue in question [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[167],"class_list":["post-692","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-exclusive","tag-vidshkoduvannya-vytrat-na-pravnychu-dopomogu"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kmp.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/692"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kmp.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kmp.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kmp.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kmp.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=692"}],"version-history":[{"count":13,"href":"https:\/\/kmp.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/692\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18742,"href":"https:\/\/kmp.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/692\/revisions\/18742"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kmp.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=692"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kmp.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=692"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kmp.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=692"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}