New decision of the Supreme Court of Ukraine regarding TP rules: new approaches to the application of the CUP method, but, unfortunately, questions still remain
Recently, the Supreme Court of Ukraine has ruled on a case concerning the specifics of the application of methods of determining the comparative (regular) price for the purposes of transfer pricing in operations for the supply of iron ore pellets. The decision contains new approaches to the application of the CUP method. However, unfortunately, questions regarding the Supreme Court's conclusions still remain.
The full version of the article is available in Ukrainian by the link.
Full text is open only for the subscribers.
SIMILAR POSTS
Better late than never: Legislators have finally decided to improve the rules on liability for correction of TP Reporting 
1108
The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine has updated the list of low-tax jurisdictions
1560
The Multilateral Competent Authority Agreement on the Exchange of Country-by-Country Reports has entered into force for Ukraine: Implications for participants of MNE groups in Ukraine
776
Changes in the characteristics of non-resident counterparties for recognising transactions as controlled or making a 30% adjustment for corporate profit tax purposes
1835
Ukrainian Court Denies Characterization As Stewardship Expenses
877
Comparables Selection Was Correct After All, Ukrainian Court Says
434
Comparables Analysis Insufficient; Ukrainian Court Remands Case
1122
“Massive” requests regarding application of the 30% adjustment on corporate income tax. What is wrong and what to do?
2207
Ukraine: The War is not an excuse to ignore Transfer Pricing Compliance
1023
Finally! Ukraine has joined Multilateral Competent Authority Agreement on the Exchange of Country-by-Country Reports
1798
Leave a comment