+ Word must be in search result. - Words must not be in search result. * Word start/end on characters before/after symbol. ""Words in quotes will be searched as phrase.

 

KM Partners has defended the interests of METRO CASH & CARRY UKRAINE in the Constitutional Court of Ukraine confirming the right for return the local taxes’ overpayment in ATO territory

07 June, 2019 Chronicles and faces

METRO CASH & CARRY Ukraine from April 2014 to March 2016 was paying taxes for shopping centers and land plots, on which such shopping centers are located, which were in the temporarily occupied territory of Ukraine, and with the fact that the company could not really use and dispose this property. So, we can talk about the absence of reasons for taxes that are collected from the owners/users of such property.

It was recognized at the legislative level, and from January 1, 2017, such amounts of taxes were granted overpayment status. However, rather quickly after, the legislator additionally found that such amounts are not a subject to return by the Law “On Amendments to the Tax Code of Ukraine on Improvement of Investment Climate in Ukraine” of March 23, 2017, No. 1989–VIII (Law No. 1989).

However, the discretion even of the legislative authority is limited and has to comply with the Constitution. The specialists of worked out the position and the normative justification for a constitutional complaint of the METRO CASH & CARRY Ukraine and proved in the Constitutional Court of Ukraine that the provision of the Law No. 1989 regarding deprivation of the right for overpayments returning for the land tax for land plots, which are located in ATO territory (now – JFO), contradicts the rule of law principle (in particular, the guarantee of legal certainty) and violates the right of property guaranteed by the Constitution of Ukraine.

The Constitutional Court of Ukraine agreed with the position and argumentation presented in the constitutional complaint and recognized the provision of the Law No. 1989 regarding deprivation the right for return of overpayments from the land tax for land plots which are located in ATO territory, which does not comply with the provisions of part I, Article 8, part IV Article 41 of the Constitution of Ukraine. The full text of the corresponding decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine with details No. 3-p (І)/2019 as of June 5, 2019 was published on the website of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine by the link.

Due to this Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine, the rights of METRO CASH & CARRY Ukraine and other taxpayers on overpayments return from local taxes in the ATO territory will be restored, and also a solid foundation will be laid for solving other disputed tax issues and the development of tax disputes in general.

Representation of interests of METRO CASH & CARRY Ukraine during the working-out of the legal position and preparation of the appeal to the Constitutional Court of Ukraine was carried out by team of experts of , Senior of Counsel Maria Kozlenko and Lawyer Artem Shcherbyna under the supervising of Senior Partner Aleksander Minin.

Views 521

SIMILAR POSTS

Tax dispute: what else to be guided by besides the Tax Code? 28 August, 2019    359

All we need is FREEDOM! 19 June, 2019    859

Blocking of tax invoices: the position of the Supreme Court 31 May, 2019    669

Supreme Court on terms of claim submission to the court on issues, related to taxes:
(1) The “Tax” Chamber of the Cassation Administrative Court confirmed the right to apply to the court regarding fine recovery for untimely VAT reimbursement within a 1095-days limitation period
(2) The Unified Chamber of the Cassation Administrative Court confirmed the right to appeal in court of the legal act within whole period of its effect (duration of a statute)
27 March, 2019    2525

Who determines the normative monetary valuation (NMV) of land outside settlements? 19 February, 2019    443

For owners of real estate in Kyiv: property tax – what’s the rate? 13 February, 2019    381

New normative monetary valuation of lands outside of settlements starting from January 01, 2019 – myth or reality? 11 February, 2019    1021

The mission is (NOT) to be caught: supposedly extended deadlines for appealing on tax assessment? 21 January, 2019    2085

Whether income upon credit’s receipt or upon some other long-term debt’s appearance is recognized for the taxation purpose? 28 December, 2018    467

Judgments of the Moscow City Arbitration Court as of November 14, 2018 27 December, 2018    141

Penalties for the late registration of tax invoices, which are not provided to the buyers (further development) 11 December, 2018    1024

Review of practice of the Supreme Court in 2018 related to the differentiation of civil and labor relations 11 December, 2018    713

Comment