Each company used to deal with control authorities in its business activity: fiscal, labour, firefighting services, environmental, architectural and engineering inspection… And each company has several vivid stories on illegal actions of inspectors and necessity to adjudicate the rights in court. Such stories are told nearly in a similar way: audit, illegal documents of disposition, collecting of evidence, claim, numerous court sessions, legal fees (with little chance to be refunded by the court), winning, appeal claim, winning, cassation claim, another winning… And it seems that it is over, end of the story, but no – new audit is getting started and everything starts again circle-wise. So what should be done if the situation with subsequent won court does not change?
“Sick and tired” of criminal cases on disputes with tax authorities? Had enough of non-recognition of tax credit due to verdicts on contractors? What shall be done then?
One can wait for the changes inside the country and hope that sooner or later this sphere will also be property regulated and the case will be dismissed. But how long one shall wait?
The aim of the project:to reach the unity in understanding that “the nature of functioning of judicial authority consists that in such functioning the logic of power substitutes for power of logic” (Boštjan Zupančič)