+ Word must be in search result. - Words must not be in search result. * Word start/end on characters before/after symbol. ""Words in quotes will be searched as phrase.

 

 

Why does Law No. 1210 need a veto

21 February, 2020 Blog

Post is available in Ukrainian language
Views 3362

SIMILAR POSTS

Does the new system of the Tax Code regulations on control of a reasonable economic substance (business purpose) of taxpayer’s business operations have a reasonable economic justification? 18 February, 2021    647

Changes in the tax sphere effective from January 1, 2021 02 February, 2021    533

The Draft Law No. 4065 – what shall we expect? 05 November, 2020    1717

No limitation period for tax offences? 09 July, 2020    668

Auditor’s Report for 2019 without watchful eye of tax authorities 12 June, 2020    1159

Transfer Pricing and the Law No. 466-IX: Review of the most important changes 09 June, 2020    1223

Alexander Minin and Ivan Shynkarenko delivered their reports at the webinar “Opinions of experts regarding the Law No. 466″ 09 June, 2020    902

Alexander Minin comments about the effect of the Law No. 466-IX on IT-industry in Ukraine 29 May, 2020    716

Guilty though guiltless
Expected problems of application of p. 2 Art. 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms when determining guilt under the Draft Law No. 1210
13 May, 2020    1333

Factual embedding of the presumption of guilt by the Draft Law No.1210 in violation of the Constitution and international obligations of Ukraine (or why the attitude to respective provisions of the Draft Law No.1210 is so negative) 11 March, 2020    2563

The Draft Law No. 1210 on Amendments to the Tax Code as an offer for the President to undersign in violation of the Constitution: will the President sign it? (updated) 21 February, 2020    1547

“Day D”: Draft Law No. 1210 has been adopted in the second reading and as a whole 17 January, 2020    1557

Comment