+ Word must be in search result. - Words must not be in search result. * Word start/end on characters before/after symbol. ""Words in quotes will be searched as phrase.

 

The First Shots in Ukrainian TP Court Practice

authors: Ivan Shynkarenko, Kateryna Utiralova

source: "WTS Transfer Pricing Newsletter #2/2017"

05 October, 2017 Press

Transfer pricing rules were introduced in Ukraine not a long time ago – from September 1, 2013. However, now we can speak about the first results of TP audits and the first court practice on TP matters.

Court disputes regarding TP rules can be divided into two groups:

  1.  disputes on procedural issues;
  2. disputes on the essence of TP rules.

Procedural disputes on determination of “controlled” transactions

A notable group of “procedural disputes” relates to situations where the fiscal authority insisted on the recognition as “controlled” transactions with LLP registered in the United Kingdom by the partners that are residents of “low-tax” jurisdictions, included into the special list of “low-tax” jurisdictions, adopted by the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine for TP purposes. Such partnerships are fiscally transparent, that means that, they are not taxable in the UK and due to the fact that the UK was not included into the abovementioned list of “low-tax” jurisdictions, such transactions formally do not trigger TP control in Ukraine. The courts mostly applied formal approach and took a side of the taxpayers, concluding that the formal criteria for the recognition of transactions as “controlled” were not met in such cases.

At the same time now we expect that such kinds of disputes will find a new lease of life, due to the recent amendments introduced into the Tax Code, which provide that in addition to the controlled transactions with legal entities registered at the “low-tax” jurisdictions, from 2017 TP control will cover transactions with special legal forms of entities that do not pay corporate income tax at their tax residence. The List of such legal forms for particular countries is in force from July 4, 2017. And, for example, from now on it is directly provided that transactions with LLP from the UK fall under TP control in Ukraine.

The question is whether the courts of cassation will cancel positive appeal decisions for the taxpayers, referring, for example, to the rule of the superiority of the essence over the form of legal relationships.

Another kind of disputes concerns question of numerous wording and re-wording of Article 39 of the Tax Code that laid down TP rules in Ukraine together with the absence of proper transitional provisions.

The existing practice on the essence of TP rules application

The most common are disputes over application of comparative uncontrollable price method. Fiscal authority usually pays special attention to exporters of agricultural products, metal products and chemical products. In one of the case the fiscal authority made a tax assessment based on ranges of prices for agricultural products according to the publications, which were recognized as official sources of information in the period of 2013-2014. The court in the first and in the appeal instances abolished the assessment based on the fact that information available in such publications was not sufficient to determine the comparability of transactions.

Existing disputes also indicate that economic analysis shall not result only at the market-based profitability range. Not less attention should be paid to the way in which the indicator of the profitability of the controlled transaction is calculated. It is necessary to ensure the logic and transparency of such calculation, as well as the competent statement of all the essential aspects of its calculation in TP documentation.

Download pdf-file of WTS Transfer Pricing Newsletter #2/2017 (267 Kb)

Views 455

SIMILAR POSTS

Bulgaria is excluded from the list of “low tax” jurisdictions for TP purposes 27 April, 2018    388

Transfer Pricing penalties: is it OK to apply penalty for the late submission of the report on controlled transactions for the period before January 01, 2017? 26 April, 2018    252

Transfer pricing penalties: general overview 12 March, 2018    754

The list of “low-tax” jurisdictions, adopted by the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine for transfer pricing purposes, was amended 07 March, 2018    1033

TP disputes: what we can understand from the first dispute in Ukraine that concerns application of the net margin method 23 February, 2018    564

Special rules concerning the permanent establishment of non-residents in TP changes from January 01, 2018. What to prepare for? 06 February, 2018    671

30 % adjustment under subpara. 140.5.4 of the Tax Code of Ukraine from now on will cover one more kind of transactions. What do we think about practical application of new rules? 22 January, 2018    729

The list of legal forms of non-residents who do not pay income tax (corporate tax), including tax on income received outside the state of such non-residents’ registration, and /or are not tax residents of the state in which they are registered as legal entities 22 January, 2018    593

The list of states (territories), which meet the criteria established in subsection 39.2.1.2 of subparagraph 39.2.1 of paragraph 39.2 of Article 39 of the Tax Code of Ukraine 22 January, 2018    395

The new transitional provisions on TP self-adjustments: more questions than answers yet again? 19 January, 2018    381

“Normal price” Vs. “Arm’s length price”. Is it possible to dot the i’s and cross the t’s? 16 January, 2018    528

Individual Tax Advice of the SFS “On procedure for determination of normal prices” as of June 12, 2017 16 January, 2018    271

Comment