Thresholds of criminal liability under Art. 212 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine in 2019
The Law of Ukraine “On the State Budget for the year 2019” No. 2629-VIII as of November 23, 2018 has increased not only the minimum wage, which numerous state accruals and calculations are related to.
The Law of Ukraine “On the State Budget for the year 2019” has traditionally increased the living wage for an employable person in 2019, which is equal to UAH 1921 starting from January 01, 2019.
As known, this index is determinative in terms of the thresholds of criminal liability for tax evasion under Article 212 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.
In particular, significant, large and especially large tax evasion is determined in case of non-receipt of taxes to the state budget in amount that exceeds in 1000 and more, 3000 and more, 5000 and more times respectively the tax-free minimum income of citizens (note to Article 212 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine). Therefore, in accordance with para. 5 of Subsection 1 of Section XX and subpara. 169.1.1 of the Tax Code of Ukraine, the tax-free minimum income of citizens is equal to 50% of the living wage for an employable person.
Thus, the tax-free minimum income of citizens in 2019 is equal to UAH 960.5 (50 % of UAH 1921).
Thus, the qualification under Article 212 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine in 2019 will be conducted under the following thresholds (for the sake of convenience is provided in comparison with the respective thresholds in previous years):
As one can see, thresholds of criminal liability approximate to UAH 1 billion.
We would like to remind that qualification is conducted under thresholds, which were valid in the year of the offense committed. For more details please find our newsletter “Criminal liability for tax evasion (Art. 212 of Ukrainian Criminal Code) – marginal amounts underpaid which may give rise to criminal liability as well as some other issues of importance”.
The above commentary presents the general statement for information purposes only and as such may not be practically used in specific cases without professional advice.
Kind regards,
SIMILAR POSTS
The importance of being consistent 
302
Should we trust the verdicts and other decisions in criminal proceedings under Art. 205 of the CC of Ukraine?
527
On the issue of possible tactics and updating approaches to court proceedings regarding «sham transactions»
533
The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court has announced an adjournment in case on VAT budget reimbursement
519
Statistics on criminal proceedings regarding Art. 212 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine within 9 months of 2018
774
The results of the latest «2018 International Tax Competitiveness Index» research or the reason why ECT is the most promising tax reform
456
Cassation Administrative Court is applying to the Grand Chamber: urgent questions and results
887
Judgments of the Supreme Court in tax disputes under Art. 205 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine concerning the contractor (the first 8 months)
525
Is the practice of the Supreme Court formed if there is Art. 205 of the Criminal Code concerning the contractor?
2839
Criminal proceedings on tax evasion: statistics and verdicts within first half of 2018
833
Is ATO over?
Or “I’ve brought you a package… But I will not give it to you”
2508
The Supreme Court: the right to appeal court rulings on appointment of tax audits within criminal proceedings is approved!
5361
Leave a comment