+ Word must be in search result. - Words must not be in search result. * Word start/end on characters before/after symbol. ""Words in quotes will be searched as phrase.

 

Thresholds of criminal liability for Unified Social Tax evasion (under Art. 212-1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine) in 2019

17 July, 2019 Newsletters

Article 212-1 “Unified Social Tax on obligatory state social insurance and insurance premiums on obligatory state pension insurance evasion” of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (hereinafter referred to as “the Criminal Code”) envisages the responsibility for evasion from payment of such premiums in fixed amounts – significant (part 1 of Article 212-1), large (part 2 of Article 212-1), especially large (part 3 of Article 212-1).

Such amounts are defined in footnote to Article 212-1 of the Criminal Code and pegged to fixed amount of “tax-free minimum income”, namely 1000 amounts of tax-free minimum income or more for significant amount, 3000 amounts of tax-free minimum income or more for large amount and 5000 amounts of tax-free minimum income or more for especially large amount of tax evasion.

According to para. 5 of Subsection 1 of Section XX and subpara. 169.1.1 of the Tax Code of Ukraine the tax-free minimum income is equal to 50% of minimum cost of living for employable person.

The minimum cost of living for employable person for 2019 is set by the Law of Ukraine “On the State Budget of Ukraine for 2019” and amounts to 1 921 UAH as of January 1, 2019.

Therefore, the thresholds of subsumption of the Unified Social Tax on obligatory state social insurance and insurance premiums on obligatorystate pension insurance evasion in 2019 amounts to (for convenience the data are provided in comparison with data for 2017 and 2018):

Besides, same thresholds are also set for subsumption of tax evasion (Art. 212 of the Criminal Code). For more details please find our newsletter “Thresholds of criminal liability under Art. 212 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine in 2019”.

Please note that subsumption is executed according to threshold in force in the year of commission of the offence.

The above commentary presents the general statement for information purposes only and as such may not be practically used in specific cases without professional advice.

Kind regards,

© WTS Consulting LLC, 2019

Views 4977

SIMILAR POSTS

The “false bottom” of the Draft Law on communication between business and tax authorities No. 9662 15 March, 2024    346

Where to find the true law? OR
How to determine valid provisions of the Tax Code at the particular time period?
19 January, 2024    307

It didn’t go well: “Amendments of Lozovyi” were partially canceled 14 December, 2023    337

Thresholds of criminal liability under Article 212 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine in 2024 05 December, 2023    756

An attempt to cancel “amendments of Lozovyi”– business, stand by! 14 November, 2023    377

Terms of pre-trial investigation in wartime: has the Law No. 3341-IX dotted the i’s and crossed the t’s? 11 October, 2023    376

Alexander Minin delivered report in the XII Tax Forum of the Ukrainian Bar Association 28 September, 2023    275

Terms of pre-trial investigation [in ALL criminal proceedings, where no one was notified of suspicion], are terminated until the end of martial law. But what if to get a new angle on? 18 August, 2023    1112

Is a taxpayer entitled to submit to the court documents, which were not previously provided to the tax authority, and is there a ground for the court to disregard these documents? 15 May, 2023    1924

The status of “risky”: To appeal or not to appeal? 23 November, 2022    1273

The tax authorities will not pay a court fee when applying to the court for recovering a tax debt and Unified Social Contribution debt 08 November, 2022    533

Amendments to the list of documentary off-plan audits, which are allowed to be carried out for the period before the termination or cancellation of martial law 07 November, 2022    842

Comment