Thresholds of criminal liability for tax evasion under Art. 212 of the Criminal Code in 2017
Which amount of tax notification-decisions would become intimidating this year?

11 January, 2017 Newsletters

The increase of the minimum wage, to which a large number of charges and settlements of accounts in the state are tied, is not the only thing, which has been increased by the Law of Ukraine (hereinafter – “the Law”) “On the State Budget for 2017” No. 1801-VIII as of December 21, 2016.

The minimum poverty line for the employable person in 2017 has been traditionally increased by the Law “On the State Budget for 2017”, which since January 1, 2017 constitutes 1600 UAH.

At the same time precisely this indicator is decisive for determination for thresholds of the criminal liability for tax evasion provided by Art. 212 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (hereinafter – “the Criminal Code”).

In particular, tax evasion in considerable, large and especially large amounts is determined in the case of non-receipt of tax payments to the state budget in amount, which is in 1000 and > 3000 and > 5000 and > respectively, higher than the tax-free minimum incomes (the Note to Art. 212 of the Criminal Code). In its turn, the tax-free minimum income is equal to 50% of wage for the employable person under para. 5 of subsection 1 of Section XX and subpara.169.1.1 of the Tax Code of Ukraine.

It means that the tax-free minimum income is 800 UAH (50% from 1 600 UAH). Therefore, the qualification of liability under Art. 212 of the Criminal Code in 2017 will be carry out under thresholds rates as follows (for convenience it is provided in comparison with thresholds in the previous years):

art.212_eng

For more details about necessity of the significant legislative increase of thresholds of the criminal liability under Art. 212 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, please read newsletter by the link.

The above commentary presents the general statement for information purposes only and as such may not be practically used in specific cases without professional advice.

Kind regards,

© WTS Consulting LLC, 2017

Views 69169

SIMILAR POSTS

Criminal liability for rulemaking, which leads to decrease in tax revenues 13 October, 2017    268

Criminal proceedings for tax evasion in first half of 2017: “ghost” of tax police and “efficiency” of the court 27 September, 2017    416

Verdicts in criminal proceedings for tax evasion in the first half of 2017 26 September, 2017    111

Criminal proceedings for tax evasion in the first quarter of 2017: verdicts, trends and statistics 05 July, 2017    865

Criminal liability for tax evasion – how it was corroborated by the courts in 2016 and what are the real sanctions 22 February, 2017    4082

Criminal proceedings for tax evasion in 2016: verdicts, trends and statistics 17 January, 2017    2046

Verdicts in criminal proceedings for tax evasion in the second half of 2016 17 January, 2017    1371

Are the steps on reducing amount of criminal proceedings upon results of tax audits effective? 17 October, 2016    557

Criminal proceedings under Article 212 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine for the first half of 2016: statistics, verdicts and trends? 04 October, 2016    1635

Verdicts in criminal proceedings for tax evasion in the first half of 2016 04 October, 2016    721

Who should pay taxes and penalties for exemption from liability under part 4 Article 212 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine? 30 May, 2016    1339

Paid taxes – no worries 12 May, 2016    511

Comment