New court fee rates for submission of an administrative claim to the court effected

30 October, 2013 Newsletters

The Law of Ukraine ‘On Introduction of Changes to Certain Laws of Ukraine with Regard to Payment of Court Fee’, as effected on October 23, 2013, introduces, inter alia, new rates of court fee for submission of administrative claims as well as new rules of its payment.

First of all, the changes provide for approximately two times increase of the rate of court fee, which is to be paid for submission of administrative claims.

Currently the court fee rate for submission of non-material administrative claims is set at the level of 0,06 of the amount of minimum salary.

For submission of material administrative claims the court fee rate is set at the level of 2 per cent of the amount of material demands. However, the amount of the court fee, calculated in such manner, shall not be less than 1,5 of the amount of minimum salary (which starting from January 1, 2014 equals to UAH 1 827) and shall not exceed 4 amounts of minimum salary (which starting from January 1, 2014 equals to UAH 4 872).

The Law has not only changed the court fee rate, but also changed the procedure of payment of court fees for submission of material administrative claims,including claims on cancellation of tax notifications1. Currently para. 3 of Article 4 of the Law of Ukraine ‘On Court Fee’ as amended provides the following:

«10 per cent of the amount of the court fee rate shall paid while submitting material administrative claim. The rest of the amount of the court fee shall be collected from the Claimant or from the Defendant, pro rata, to the part of claims satisfied or denied by the court».

Thus, currently only 10 % of the court fee, rather its full amount, shall be paid before the material administrative claim is filed to the court.

If the court allows all material claims of the Claimant, the latter shall not pay the rest 90 % of the court fee.

In case all material claims are denied, the court rules that the Claimant shall pay the rest   90 % of the court fee or obliges the parties to pay the court fee, pro rata, to those material claims which were satisfied and denied.

The above commentary presents the general statement for information purposes only and as such may not be practically used in specific cases without professional advice.

Footnotes:

1According to the Letter of the Supreme Administrative Court of Ukraine of 18.01.2012 No. 165/11/13-12.

Kind regards,

© TOV "KM Partners", 2013

Views 4629

SIMILAR POSTS

Court practice of the European Court of Human Rights on the issues of court fees 30 December, 2015    2685

About materiality or immateriality of the court fee. Or if unclear – it is all about money again 07 December, 2015    629

Rules in tax and customs disputes in respect of court fee changes from September 1, 2015 19 November, 2015    1048

Changes of the court fee payment: how much will the taxpayer pay for the dispute with the tax body? 22 July, 2015    3323

Administrative appeal of tax notification-decisions is not an efficient way to protect taxpayers’ rights 13 May, 2014    2477

Reimbursement of expenses as method of struggle against tax lawlessness: Part III 26 December, 2013    11881

Reimbursement of expenses as method of struggle against tax lawlessness. Part IV 09 August, 2013    11760

Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine No. 6-rp/2013 dated 11 July, 2013 in court case № 1-4/2013 (case on reimbursement of expenses for legal services within commercial proceedings) 09 August, 2013    4710

Reimbursement of expenses as method of struggle against tax lawlessness 03 July, 2013    6283

Reimbursement of expenses as method of struggle against tax lawlessness: Part II 22 May, 2012    13816

Reimbursement of expenses as method of struggle against tax lawlessness: Part I 18 May, 2012    12141

Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation as of December 21, 2004 № 454 concerning the court’s obligation to recover costs for the services on representation in court within reasonable limits. 09 April, 2012    6492

Comment