+ Word must be in search result. - Words must not be in search result. * Word start/end on characters before/after symbol. ""Words in quotes will be searched as phrase.

 

The “trash duty” at customs is abolished now: the procedure of customs clearance of goods imported in packaging is suspended since December 31, 2012

25 January, 2013 Newsletters

The State Customs Service of Ukraine in its Letter No. 11.1/1.2-12/540-ЕP dated January 18, 2013 has confirmed the absence of legal grounds for fulfillment of the Joint Order1 establishing the procedure of customs clearance of goods imported in packaging.

Namely, the Joint Order obliged the importers of goods in packaging to conclude an agreement with the State Company “Ukrekoresursy”. For rendering of services on organization of packaging’ utilization  under such agreement the importers were obliged to make advance payments. Thus, customs clearance was conditioned by putting the personal seal “Import Allowed” by the state ecology inspector, which was stamped only after evidencing the payment for “services” of the SC “Urkekoresursy”.

In fact, now importers are not legally obliged to pay such “trash duty”.

Thus, the Joint Order was suspended since December 31, 2012 by the Decision of the State Business Service of Ukraine 2. Moreover, the Order of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine No. 101/5 cancelled the state registration of the Joint Order which is the ground for its further abolition by the bodies which have adopted it (paras. 19-20 of the Regulation “On the State Registration of Normative Acts of Ministries and Other Executive Bodies”).

Therefore, at this moment the importers are not obliged to conclude an agreement with SC “Ukrekoresursy” and to pay for its services as far as the customs bodies do not have any legal grounds to demand the respective documents for the customs clearance.We also do not see the risks of additional assessment of the respective payments by customs bodies in future. Thus, the “trash duty” is not included in the system of mandatory taxes and duties. The tax and customs bodies are not authorized to control the payment of such “duty”. In fact, neither tax inspections nor customs bodies have the power to assess additional monetary obligations upon the tax audits or post audits of the importers with respect to “trash duty”. The SC “Ukrekoresursy” and the Ministry of Economy of Ukraine to which it is attributed have no powers to control the respective payments either,  moreover to levy any duties. There is no any other normative document which would stipulate the obligation to pay “trash duty”.

The above commentary presents the general statement for information purposes only and as such may not be practically used in specific cases without professional advice.

Notes:

1The Joint Order of the Ministry of Economy of Ukraine, the Ministry of the Environmental Protection of Ukraine and the State Customs Service No. 789/414/709 dated 30.07.2009 “On the Procedure of the Сustoms Сlearance of the Goods Imported in Packaging”.

2Decision No. 7 of 30.10.2012 “On the necessity of elimination of violations of the principles of the state regulatory policy by the Ministry of Economic Development and Trade, the Ministry of Ecology and Natural Resources of Ukraine and the State Customs Service of Ukraine in accordance with the requirements of the Law of Ukraine “On the Principles of the State Regulatory Policy in the Area of the Economic Activity” on abolition of the Joint Order of the Ministry of Economy of Ukraine, the Ministry of the Environmental Protection of Ukraine and the State Customs Service No. 789/414/709 dated 30.07.2009 “On the Procedure of the Сustoms Сlearance of the Goods Imported in Packaging”.

Kind regards,

© TOV "KM Partners", 2013

Views 8490

SIMILAR POSTS

Customs value disputes: a review of recent decisions of the Supreme Court 15 April, 2021    1586

Authorized Economic Operators (AEO): who can get this status? 14 January, 2020    2182

Updating the procedure of customs clearance under the Law on Authorized Economic Operators 16 December, 2019    960

Has the Supreme Court legitimated transit cars with euro-numbers? 23 October, 2018    2131

“The state has no responsibility for anything it does” (interview of partners at KM Partners for Yurydychna Gazeta) 21 June, 2018    3954

Controlling authorities without powers, or what do the euphemisms in lawmaking lead to (customs post-audit is currently illegal?) 20 March, 2018    1115

Remuneration of the resident forwarding agent and customs value. To include or not to include – that is the question. Or not a question anymore? 24 July, 2017    3046

What should be done with the Ukrainian customs system? 27 June, 2017    1502

Draft of the amendments to the Procedure for the inclusion of royalties/license fees in the customs value. What`s new? 21 June, 2017    1448

Your goods may be brought to occupied territories from other countries? Then get ready to suspension of foreign economic activity in Ukraine 26 May, 2017    1746

Ukrainian customs regime of inward processing: Is there a need of “crush-test” for the applied business model? 18 May, 2017    1775

Transfer pricing and customs valuation: touch points and how business can use them 10 March, 2017    5903

Comment