+ Word must be in search result. - Words must not be in search result. * Word start/end on characters before/after symbol. ""Words in quotes will be searched as phrase.

 

Supreme Court of Ukraine confirmed the right of the taxpayers to Appeal the Individual Tax Consultations within the Court

24 March, 2016 Newsletters

Newsletter is available in Ukrainian and Russian languages

Kind regards,

© WTS Consulting LLC, 2016

Views 762

SIMILAR POSTS

The right for renewal of terms for appeal vs. res judicata principle 06 April, 2018    1184

Updating! The case for “forming a single law enforcement practice” regarding the assessment of the verdict under Art. 205 of the Criminal Code in relation to the director of the counteragent was transferred for consideration of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court 23 March, 2018    745

The court ruling of the Court of Cassation as the Supreme Court as of February 21, 2018 23 March, 2018    321

Abuse of procedural rights. The first сourt practice of applying the provisions of the CAPU 20 March, 2018    396

The first working results of the new Supreme Court: have the expectations of taxpayers been fulfilled? 24 January, 2018    1899

Changes in tactics and strategy in disputes with state authorities, considering the changes of approaches to reimbursement of costs for legal support 18 January, 2018    593

To which court to apply today… 12 January, 2018    485

When to expect the “discounts” for filing to the court the documents in electronic form? 22 December, 2017    328

New version of the Code on administrative proceedings of Ukraine becomes effective on December, 15. Key changes to consider now 13 December, 2017    931

The draft Code on administrative proceedings of Ukraine increases the rights defensibility, but still everything depends on the judge. Is there a mechanism for the effective influence on the judge? 05 October, 2017    498

Review of ECHR case-law relevant for tax disputes 22 August, 2017    988

Court fees: is it possible to expect compensation in the case of the respondent’s voluntary fulfillment of the claims before the completion of the trial? 21 August, 2017    959

Comment