+ Word must be in search result. - Words must not be in search result. * Word start/end on characters before/after symbol. ""Words in quotes will be searched as phrase.

 

The Ministry of Revenues and Duties clarified some aspects concerning the reporting on controlled transactions upon the results of 2013, as well as expressed the position on application of 5% fine

17 December, 2013 Newsletters

On November 22, 2013 the Ministry of Revenues and Duties has finally adopted by its Order No. 699 the Generalized tax consultation on the application of certain provisions of tax legislation concerning transfer pricing (hereinafter – “the Consultation”). In this newsletter we would like to discuss the most urgent aspects of the Consultation concerning reporting of controlled transactions upon the results of 2013 as well as the fine for the failure to submit the report.

Earlier we have noted that entering of the new rules on transfer pricing control into force on September 1, 2013 may be caused by the intention to expand these rules back to the period of year 2013.

Such anticipation was proved to be true only partially. Thus, according to the response to Question 1 of the Consultation the report upon the results of 2013 shall be submitted in due date, i.e. until May 1, 2014. But only transactions taking part within the period from 01.09.2013 till 31.12.2013 should be reflected in such report.

At the same time in order to determine whether the criteria of turnover with the counteragent in the amount of UAH 50 mln. necessary for the recognition of the transaction as controlled is met, all transactions with such counteragent conducted in 2013 shall be accounted.

The Consultation (responses to the Questions 2, 3 and 4) contains the position of the Ministry of Revenues and Duties regarding the way of calculation of the amount of transactions with each separate counteragent.

In particular, the Ministry of Revenues and Duties considers that the amounts of credit, deposit, loans, accrued interest, amounts of repayable financial aid, as well as the value of goods on commission, agency and other similar agreements, commission (agency) remuneration and the value of investment shall be taken into account.

Such reading is extremely formal, but the wording of the Tax Code unfortunately admits it. Concerning the situations when the taxpayer and the counteragent carry out transactions of both purchase and sales, in order to determine the turnover all such amounts of transactions shall be taken together. With such formal reading we are grateful, that it is allowed at least to determine the turnover based on contractual and not “arm’s length prices” prices.

Regarding determination of the date of transaction for the purpose of composing the report, as the Ministry of Revenues and Duties explained, such date is considered to be the date of passing of title to the goods or the date of drawing up the act or any other document confirming the performance of works or rendering of services.

Thus, the report upon the results of last quarter of 2013 should be submitted in case if there are controlled transactions in that quarter. And it should be done by May 1. Late submission of the report, according to the Ministry of Revenues and Duties, is considered as a failure to submit the report and will result in the application of a fine in the amount of 5 % of the amount of controlled transactions.

In addition, we recommend determining the range of controlled transactions reflected in the report carefully. Thus, the Ministry of Revenues and Duties in the Consultation (response to the Question 7) used the extremely fiscal interpretation of application of 5% fine and decide to set the fine on the amount of controlled transaction, not reflected in the report, even if such report is submitted in due time.

In our opinion, the wording of the Tax Сode does not give the ground for such reading – the given sanction is established for the failure to submit a report and does not pertain to adequacy of its content. For example, the Tax Сode of Russian Federation, on the basis of which the national system of norms which regulates transfer pricing was “developed”, the responsibility is established both for the failure to submit a report on controlled transactions and for the incomplete/ inadequate data submission. In the Tax Code of Ukraine there is no such provision, and thus there is no ground to expand the sphere of application of sanctions in such a manner. We do not see any ground to apply the fine even if 90 % of transactions are not reflected in report, but the report was actually submitted.

The above commentary presents the general statement for information purposes only and as such may not be practically used in specific cases without professional advice.

Kind regards,

© TOV "KM Partners", 2013

Views 3165

SIMILAR POSTS

Global Trend: Operations with Raw Materials and Traditional Hard Industrial Products as a target of TP 20 November, 2018    335

Parallel Import: Hidden Tax Risks for Official Importers in the context of Transfer Pricing rules 24 October, 2018    560

The spirit of the international community of TP professionals

Impressions of participation in the Global Transfer Pricing Forum in Munich under the auspices of the International Tax Review
17 October, 2018    697

WTS Global Country TP Guide:
A comprehensive survey on Transfer Pricing from 73 countries
12 October, 2018    887

Bulgaria is excluded from the list of “low tax” jurisdictions for TP purposes 27 April, 2018    815

Transfer Pricing penalties: is it OK to apply penalty for the late submission of the report on controlled transactions for the period before January 01, 2017? 26 April, 2018    394

Transfer pricing penalties: general overview 12 March, 2018    29754

The list of “low-tax” jurisdictions, adopted by the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine for transfer pricing purposes, was amended 07 March, 2018    2382

TP disputes: what we can understand from the first dispute in Ukraine that concerns application of the net margin method 23 February, 2018    761

Special rules concerning the permanent establishment of non-residents in TP changes from January 01, 2018. What to prepare for? 06 February, 2018    1062

30 % adjustment under subpara. 140.5.4 of the Tax Code of Ukraine from now on will cover one more kind of transactions. What do we think about practical application of new rules? 22 January, 2018    1063

The list of legal forms of non-residents who do not pay income tax (corporate tax), including tax on income received outside the state of such non-residents’ registration, and /or are not tax residents of the state in which they are registered as legal entities 22 January, 2018    1761

Comment