+ Word must be in search result. - Words must not be in search result. * Word start/end on characters before/after symbol. ""Words in quotes will be searched as phrase.

 

Іnterrogation protocol and tax information cannot be regarded as evidences of “fictitiousness”

13 April, 2018 Exclusive

Article is available in Ukrainian and Russian languages
Views 1678

SIMILAR POSTS

Should we trust the verdicts and other decisions in criminal proceedings under Art. 205 of the CC of Ukraine? 12 December, 2018    144

On the issue of possible tactics and updating approaches to court proceedings regarding «sham transactions» 30 November, 2018    231

Statistics on criminal proceedings regarding Art. 212 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine within 9 months of 2018 30 October, 2018    414

Cassation Administrative Court is applying to the Grand Chamber: urgent questions and results 26 September, 2018    514

Judgments of the Supreme Court in tax disputes under Art. 205 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine concerning the contractor (the first 8 months) 21 August, 2018    451

Is the practice of the Supreme Court formed if there is Art. 205 of the Criminal Code concerning the contractor? 21 August, 2018    2755

Criminal proceedings on tax evasion: statistics and verdicts within first half of 2018 17 August, 2018    663

The Supreme Court: the right to appeal court rulings on appointment of tax audits within criminal proceedings is approved! 20 July, 2018    4574

Verdicts in criminal proceedings under Art. 212 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine for the first quarter of 2018 02 July, 2018    399

Criminal proceedings on tax evasion within first quarter of 2018: how did the year begin for taxpayers? 02 July, 2018    485

“The fifth wheel to the coach”, or what is Art. 205 of the Criminal Code in practice for? 27 June, 2018    678

Criminal proceedings on tax evasion: summary statistics for 2017 17 April, 2018    909

Comment