+ Word must be in search result. - Words must not be in search result. * Word start/end on characters before/after symbol. ""Words in quotes will be searched as phrase.

 

Іnterrogation protocol and tax information cannot be regarded as evidences of “fictitiousness”

13 April, 2018 Exclusive

Article is available in Ukrainian and Russian languages
Views 1759

SIMILAR POSTS

The importance of being consistent 01 March, 2019    302

Thresholds of criminal liability under Art. 212 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine in 2019 09 January, 2019    5559

Should we trust the verdicts and other decisions in criminal proceedings under Art. 205 of the CC of Ukraine? 12 December, 2018    527

On the issue of possible tactics and updating approaches to court proceedings regarding «sham transactions» 30 November, 2018    533

Statistics on criminal proceedings regarding Art. 212 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine within 9 months of 2018 30 October, 2018    774

Cassation Administrative Court is applying to the Grand Chamber: urgent questions and results 26 September, 2018    887

Judgments of the Supreme Court in tax disputes under Art. 205 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine concerning the contractor (the first 8 months) 21 August, 2018    525

Is the practice of the Supreme Court formed if there is Art. 205 of the Criminal Code concerning the contractor? 21 August, 2018    2839

Criminal proceedings on tax evasion: statistics and verdicts within first half of 2018 17 August, 2018    833

The Supreme Court: the right to appeal court rulings on appointment of tax audits within criminal proceedings is approved! 20 July, 2018    5360

Verdicts in criminal proceedings under Art. 212 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine for the first quarter of 2018 02 July, 2018    500

Criminal proceedings on tax evasion within first quarter of 2018: how did the year begin for taxpayers? 02 July, 2018    528

Comment