+ Word must be in search result. - Words must not be in search result. * Word start/end on characters before/after symbol. ""Words in quotes will be searched as phrase.

 

Changes in labour law regarding probationary period

06 June, 2016 Analytics

On May 17, 2016 the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine has passed a Law of Ukraine «On Amendments to the Labor Code of Ukraine (Concerning the Probation Period)» (hereinafter referred to as «the Law»). The following changes have been introduced to the Labor Code of Ukraine by the Law, namely:

  1. The employer is obliged to notify the employee during his probation period in written three days prior of the impending termination of his employment agreement due to the establishment of his inconsistency with the position or the work for which he was employed

This means that the employer shall have to assess in advance whether the employee is suitable for the position or work, entrusted to him. Such assessment has to be done at least three days prior to the expiration of employee’s probation period, but not on the last day of the probation period as it often happens on practice. Otherwise, the employer will not be able to notify the employee of the impending dismissal in time, which, in case of trial, may lead to the renewal of the employee.

Please note that the Law is not signed by the President of Ukraine and shall enter into force on the day following the day of its publication. Therefore, if an employer plans to dismiss the employee who has not passed the probation and the dismissal accidentally falls on the date of entry the law into force, it is likely that the employee will be able to successfully appeal such dismissal due to lack of advance notice of dismissal.

  1. The Law has enlarged the list of persons for whom the probation cannot be set up. Specifically:
  • persons appointed to the position;
  • winners of the competitive selection for vacant positions;
  • persons who have passed the training during hiring off-the-work;
  • pregnant women;
  • single mothers with a child under the age of fourteen or a disabled child;
  • persons with whom a fixed-term employment agreement for up to 12 months is to be concluded;
  • persons on temporary and seasonal works;
  • internally displaced persons1.
  1. From now on the days when the employee actually has not worked, regardless of the reason, are not included into the probation period. Thus, the obligatory extension of probation period is set up for the whole period when the employee was absent from work.
  1. The dismissal of the employee due to unsatisfactory probation results is now qualified as the ground of dismissal by the employer. Thereby, the employee who has not passed the probation cannot be dismissed during his temporary disability, as well as during his vacation (this rule does not apply in case of complete liquidation of the company).

The above commentary presents the general statement for information purposes only and as such may not be practically used in specific cases without professional advice.

Footnotes:

1Article 1 of the Law of Ukraine “On ensuring of rights and freedoms of internally displaced persons”

Kind regards,

© WTS Consulting LLC, 2016

Views 975

SIMILAR POSTS

Days of War of State Labour Service. The Supreme Court confirmed the 1.3 million fine imposed on entrepreneur for unreported employment 07 August, 2019    646

Draft of new Procedure for monitoring compliance with Labour Law – to learn from mistakes? The State Labour Service of Ukraine: no, never heard of it. 07 August, 2019    483

Days of war of State Labour Service.
Court case on application of civil-law contracts in relations with individuals
06 May, 2019    445

5th single tax group: “+” vs “-“ 01 March, 2019    1734

Manipulation as an investment project 25 February, 2019    613

New amount of fines for violation of the labor legislation 08 February, 2019    891

Review of practice of the Supreme Court in 2018 related to the differentiation of civil and labor relations 11 December, 2018    733

New and old risks connected to contradiction in names of the positions in the staff list of the employer and the Occupational Classification 25 October, 2018    559

Cassation Administrative Court is applying to the Grand Chamber: urgent questions and results 26 September, 2018    1786

What to do if the outdated Labor Code is not being reformed despite of ever-changing life? 20 August, 2018    11712

Changes in the order of keeping and storing employment record books of employees of representations of foreign legal entities 03 August, 2018    914

Employer’s review of the employee’s correspondence: the ECHR has changed its judgment in the case of Bărbulescu v. Romania 31 January, 2018    1725

Comment